Re: Digest for vim...@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 3 topics

2016-07-15 Thread arocker
Name extension discussion. I wholeheartedly agree with Graham Nicholls' objection to Windowsisms, but Richard Mitchell's explanation makes a lot of sense, especially > I wouldn't expect or want to have the extensions on anything in my PATH. An alternative approach might be language-specific

Re: Digest for vim...@googlegroups.com - 12 updates in 3 topics

2016-07-15 Thread Richard Mitchell
I'm fully aware the OS doesn't care about the extension. The extension is there solely for my benefit when writing code. At a glance I can tell which language I used to write something. I could use file or look at the first line myself, but a simple "ls" is all that is needed to view