Le mercredi 6 septembre 2017 10:31:42 UTC+2, LGentis a écrit :
> vim-gnome or vim-gtk : same behavior
>
>
> Le 05/09/2017 à 21:08, Bram Moolenaar a écrit :
> >> Le jeudi 17 août 2017 19:19:21 UTC+2, LGentis a écrit :
> >>> Hi to all,
> >>>
> >>> I use gvim, and cursor is by default a full black
vim-gnome or vim-gtk : same behavior
Le 05/09/2017 à 21:08, Bram Moolenaar a écrit :
Le jeudi 17 août 2017 19:19:21 UTC+2, LGentis a écrit :
Hi to all,
I use gvim, and cursor is by default a full black blinking rectangle in normal
mode, and a blinking line in insert mode, which is OK for
Paul wrote:
> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=5455 looks like spam to me.
Yeah, looks weird. I have deleted it.
--
Seen on the back of a biker's vest: If you can read this, my wife fell off.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
///
Gerald Klein wrote:
Yea that's a feather in your cap, your a viable human being that is
contributing to society in a constructive and useful way. I am glad you
feel good about yourself and no longer feel that the world has treated you
unfairly, forcing you to invade someones privacy with
On 27/12/12 10:58, John Beckett wrote:
The message (no subject) that I am replying to consisted of a
single line which was a link to some website. It was almost
certainly spam, and possibly malware, and almost certainly was
spoofed (that is, the sender was NOT Tony).
I have deleted the message
The message (no subject) that I am replying to consisted of a
single line which was a link to some website. It was almost
certainly spam, and possibly malware, and almost certainly was
spoofed (that is, the sender was NOT Tony).
I have deleted the message from the Google Groups archive (but
it
You guys suck , not everyone that sends spam is trying to hurt your
computer, as a matter of fact money is the route of all evil and if I cant
get enough of it how evil could I be? think drugs to sell guns to buy and
frustrations to take out on people that dont deserve what they got if I
cant have
No wonder you don't post a clear picture. Rant much? And so what is wrong
with the fact that people don't want their computers polluted with useless
messages being injected into there inbox's and forums. Oh and by the way,
it is money is the 'root' not route like a route you would drive on a
whats wrong is people are like sheep, your spam box isnt your computer and
guns are my solution to evil people and shouldnt be comprimised by
fuckheads like you that deserve to be shot.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Gerald Klein j...@zognet.com wrote:
No wonder you don't post a clear
Id like to say that some people have made a lot of money sending spam and
your in denial that thats where all the money is because everyone and their
mother has an email address and I can message them all for any amoun
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Money is the route of all evil because thats where your going if you want
to be free now a days.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Id like to say that some people have made a lot of money sending spam and
your in denial that thats where all the money is
What does comprimised mean? Everybody has spell check I would think even a
person such as yourself could compose an intelligent statement, but I have
no idea what that means? Further my inbox is... well mine. Coping with
individuals such as yourself is a kin to scraping off that unwanted
substance
Again? what does this mean? 'Id like to say that some people have made a
lot of money sending spam and your in denial that thats where all the money
is because everyone and their mother has an email address and I can message
them all for any amoun' Is it even English?
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:29
Ah Yes, Once again the justification of action. The quote is still 'root'
not route, admit it was your illiteracy and you will feel better. Also if
your going to spam your going to tip off potential losers with bad grammar
and bad spelling.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Dan Astle
To think I almost deleted this thread without reading it. :)
Root, not route; agreed.
Also, you're, not your and akin, not a kin. (Sorry, Gerald!) In the
interest of continuing to be a pedantic jerk, I could go on, but I'd hate
to shame Mr. Astle back into hiding, where we would once again be
Your a JOKE , all you do all day is piss people off , why are you even
sending me email. ZI dont wanna be getting any of your shit???
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Gerald Klein
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Dan Astle
At least when spammers give me a link , I have something interesting to
look at for about 5 min..
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Your a JOKE , all you do all day is piss people off , why are you even
sending me email. ZI dont wanna be getting any of
Your just an annoying fuck that fills my email box up with crap
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
At least when spammers give me a link , I have something interesting to
look at for about 5 min..
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Dan Astle
Yea that's a feather in your cap, your a viable human being that is
contributing to society in a constructive and useful way. I am glad you
feel good about yourself and no longer feel that the world has treated you
unfairly, forcing you to invade someones privacy with your own self serving
issues.
You know you are really starting to sound desperate, are you sitting behind
your computer wringing your hands and salivating at the next retort you
will write, because someone now is annoying you as much as you annoy them.
And I have always found that people that stoop to bottom feeding comments
Once again incomprehensible language, what does that even mean?
The reasons for my emails are I am amused by a low life, bottom feeding,
miscreant that still insists after all of this to publicly humiliate
himself.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Your
Like I said how does it feel? Was it good for you?
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
Your just an annoying fuck that fills my email box up with crap
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Dan Astle maximmagazin...@gmail.comwrote:
At least when spammers
I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from
ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I
mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking
about the problem (in batches of 60 at a time). Thanks to those
who responded. I unsubscribed 60 members since some of
On 12/20/2012 08:02 AM, John Beckett wrote:
I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from
ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I
mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking
about the problem (in batches of 60 at a time). Thanks to those
who
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, John Beckett johnb.beck...@gmail.comwrote:
I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from
ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I
mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking
about the problem (in batches of 60
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, JohnBeckett wrote:
I am attempting to find the vim_use member who is forwarding
mail to an account at 139.com that they are no longer using,
with the result that everyone who posts to vim_use receives a
confusing spam response from ad...@139.com 24 hours later.
I have sent
I am attempting to find the vim_use member who is forwarding
mail to an account at 139.com that they are no longer using,
with the result that everyone who posts to vim_use receives a
confusing spam response from ad...@139.com 24 hours later.
I have sent a message to all 2123 members of vim_use
This is an updated outline of the vim_use spam problem.
Following some email exchanges, I am trying a few things to see
if I can find a solution and may have more updates.
The following uses -at- instead of @ so the Google Groups
web interface will not hide the email addresses.
It appears that
On 02/12/12 10:55, John Beckett wrote:
This is an updated outline of the vim_use spam problem.
Following some email exchanges, I am trying a few things to see
if I can find a solution and may have more updates.
The following uses -at- instead of @ so the Google Groups
web interface will not
Hi,
On 25.09.2012 23:00, John Beckett wrote:
But in reality, there is not enough spam to warrant any messing
around.
In my oponion this is not related to spam.
As Marc Weber has already stated, I think it looks like an attack on the web
server. As far as I understand the issue, the uploaded
doak wrote:
Hi,
On 25.09.2012 23:00, John Beckett wrote:
But in reality, there is not enough spam to warrant any messing
around.
In my oponion this is not related to spam.
As Marc Weber has already stated, I think it looks like an attack on the web server. As
far as I understand
Charles Campbell held forth: on 09/26/2012 09:52 AM:
doak wrote:
Hi,
On 25.09.2012 23:00, John Beckett wrote:
But in reality, there is not enough spam to warrant any messing
around.
In my oponion this is not related to spam.
As Marc Weber has already stated, I think it
Excerpts from Bill Hudacek's message of Wed Sep 26 16:15:20 +0200 2012:
With all due respect, Dr., I'd suggest that at least a check of 'ctimes'
(to catch replaced files within the DocRoot or config areas of the HTTP
server) on or (soon) after the placement of the suspect images might be
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I think some spamscript were posted to vim.org yesterday:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4236
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4235
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4234
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4233
On Sep 25, 2012, at 7:23 AM, John Beckett johnb.beck...@gmail.com wrote:
Amazing. I have been checking vim.org twice a day for months and
nothing bad has happened for a long time (the last spam I
deleted was scripts 4107, 4108 in June).
Now I goofed off for 24 hours and this happens!
John Beckett wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I think some spamscript were posted to vim.org yesterday:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4236
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4235
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4234
I admit that I don't know how to do this, but perhaps the anti-spam
scheme for the mail-list (all new posters need to be approved by our
It was not about the mailinglist, but about strange image files found at
www.vim.org.
Spam at mailinglist? You can't approve, because you can't be sure about
Charles Campbell wrote:
I admit that I don't know how to do this, but perhaps the anti-spam
scheme for the mail-list (all new posters need to be approved by our
It was not about the mailinglist, but about strange image files found at
www.vim.org.
Spam at mailinglist? You can't approve,
On 25/09/12 16:21, Charles Campbell wrote:
Charles Campbell wrote:
I admit that I don't know how to do this, but perhaps the anti-spam
scheme for the mail-list (all new posters need to be approved by our
It was not about the mailinglist, but about strange image files found at
www.vim.org.
Spam
Am I right that this was caught within 24h only and fixed in not
much more time? At this point I'd like to say Good work to whoever
contributed to this outcome !!
Excerpts from Charles Campbell's message of Tue Sep 25 16:21:50 +0200 2012:
Um, that isn't what I said, or at least not what I
Charles Campbell [I think!] wrote:
I admit that I don't know how to do this, but perhaps the
anti-spam scheme for the mail-list (all new posters need to
be approved by our elite, hardworking, and underpaid group of
moderators, and, after approval, posters would have ready
access) could be
Doak wrote:
Is there no moderation for this? In any case they do appear to be
spam. They are all by the same user, posted in quick succession on the
same day, and the package files are all JPGs.
With some strange content?
ff
I wrote:
Doak wrote:
Is there no moderation for this? In any case they do appear to be
spam. They are all by the same user, posted in quick succession on the
same day, and the package files are all JPGs.
With some strange content?
!!
Take care,
Paul
From: Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net
To: Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net
Cc: doak d...@gmx.de; vim_use@googlegroups.com; Benjamin Klein
b...@silver-chalice.com
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: spam scripts on vim.org
On Sep 23, 2012, at 3:03 PM, jeroen jbu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think some spamscript were posted to vim.org yesterday:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4236
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4235
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4234
Hi there,
Is there no moderation for this? In any case they do appear to be spam. They
are all by the same user, posted in quick succession on the same day, and the
package files are all JPGs.
With some strange content?
ff d8 ff e0
Jeroen Budts wrote:
I think some spamscript were posted to vim.org yesterday:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4236
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4235
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4234
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=4233
Ali Vakilzade wrote:
this user is sending spam scripts:
http://www.vim.org/account/profile.php?user_id=48421
Deleted download and script 4044, 4045 and 4046.
Deleted user 48421.
--
Beeth Girls are like internet domain names,
the ones I like are already taken.
honx Well, you can
Yes, you are right that www.quishibaike.com is a Chinese version of
Fail my Life. The author intends to use a Python script inside Vim to
retrieve jokes from that site. It makes no sense to those who doesn't
understand Chinese, for this reason, I think, the author has written
no English
On May 6, 3:18 am, lilydjwg lilyd...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, you are right thatwww.quishibaike.comis a Chinese version of
Fail my Life. The author intends to use a Python script inside Vim to
retrieve jokes from that site. It makes no sense to those who doesn't
understand Chinese, for this
Срд, 05 Май 2010, Ben Fritz писал(а):
Today we got the following Script: comments page added on the wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Script:3083
Claiming that this plugin is spam and/or malware:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3083
The vim.org page is in a language I do
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 01:04:48AM +0800, bill lam wrote:
??, 05 ?? 2010, Ben Fritz ??(??):
Today we got the following Script: comments page added on the wiki:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Script:3083
Claiming that this plugin is spam and/or malware:
2009/10/20 Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com:
On 16/10/09 18:52, Hari Krishna Dara wrote:
I am noticing what seems like spam from the below id. The from name is
also different. Tony, are aware of this?
[...]
I noticed it, maybe later than you did because I'm badly behind in
Saluton John :)
John Beckett j...@gmail.com skribis:
A spam message about shoes made its way onto vim_use. I suspect Raúl
may have had the problem which I recently had on vim_mac, namely, I
marked a message as spam but Google sent the message to vim_mac
anyway.
In fact it has happened
54 matches
Mail list logo
