Am 08.12.2018 um 14:16 schrieb M Kelly:
Hi,
Something like:
:update|next
perhaps?
ok, cool. I didn't know about :update.
(I could even maybe handle E163, E165 for the last one)
take care,
and thank you and everyone for vim,
-m
and check out
:h 'autowrite
--
Andy
--
--
You
Hi,
> Something like:
> :update|next
> perhaps?
ok, cool. I didn't know about :update.
(I could even maybe handle E163, E165 for the last one)
take care,
and thank you and everyone for vim,
-m
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your
> Thanks. I will look into that func, or something like it.
>
> > Making the one act like the other would confuse me.
>
> I think I'm really only asking for a :x to save and move on with out
> prompting.
Something like:
:update|next
perhaps?
--
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I
Hi,
Thanks. I will look into that func, or something like it.
> Making the one act like the other would confuse me.
I think I'm really only asking for a :x to save and move on with out prompting.
take care
-m
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post!
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 10:02 PM M Kelly wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When editting many files I can just do :wn to save and go to next, but
> just curious, does anyone know of a mapping/abbrev so that :x acts like
> :x for one file (and the last file), but acts like :wn for the files in
> between ? Or
Maybe you can define a function:
function NextOrQuit()
write
if argidx() + 1 == argc()
exit # same as :x
else
wnext
endif
endfunction
then invoke it from a mapping or command of your choice, say :X or \x or ,x
Not so flexible with the exclamation marks and
