RE: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-20 Thread John Beckett
I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking about the problem (in batches of 60 at a time). Thanks to those who responded. I unsubscribed 60 members since some

Re: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-20 Thread Phil Dobbin
On 12/20/2012 08:02 AM, John Beckett wrote: I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking about the problem (in batches of 60 at a time). Thanks to those who

Re: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-20 Thread Fredrik Andersson
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, John Beckett johnb.beck...@gmail.comwrote: I have no idea why, but it appears that the spam from ad...@139.com to anyone who posts to vim_use has stopped. As I mentioned, I have emailed everyone who receives vim_use asking about the problem (in batches of 60

Re: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-17 Thread James Freer
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, JohnBeckett wrote: I am attempting to find the vim_use member who is forwarding mail to an account at 139.com that they are no longer using, with the result that everyone who posts to vim_use receives a confusing spam response from ad...@139.com 24 hours later. I have sent

Re: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-16 Thread JohnBeckett
I am attempting to find the vim_use member who is forwarding mail to an account at 139.com that they are no longer using, with the result that everyone who posts to vim_use receives a confusing spam response from ad...@139.com 24 hours later. I have sent a message to all 2123 members of vim_use

RE: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-02 Thread John Beckett
This is an updated outline of the vim_use spam problem. Following some email exchanges, I am trying a few things to see if I can find a solution and may have more updates. The following uses -at- instead of @ so the Google Groups web interface will not hide the email addresses. It appears that

Re: Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-12-02 Thread Tony Mechelynck
On 02/12/12 10:55, John Beckett wrote: This is an updated outline of the vim_use spam problem. Following some email exchanges, I am trying a few things to see if I can find a solution and may have more updates. The following uses -at- instead of @ so the Google Groups web interface will not

Spam from ad...@139.com

2012-11-29 Thread John Beckett
Does anyone have an archive of mail which includes the spam that we receive from ad...@139.com? I need to know when that spam started. I kept a few messages, and the earliest I have is 2012-07-09. Does anyone know of an earlier date? Or, can you say when it did NOT occur (that is, you posted to