On Apr 24, 9:41 am, ZyX wrote:
> > Don't forget that with an exclamation mark, if your current buffer (the
> > one you leave to edit the alternate file) is modified, and not open in
> > another window, all changes will be lost with no warning.
>
> You forgot to add `unless you have set one of 'h
On 24/04/11 16:41, ZyX wrote:
Reply to message «Re: edit alternate file -- e!# vs b!#»,
sent 18:18:38 24 April 2011, Sunday
by Tony Mechelynck:
Don't forget that with an exclamation mark, if your current buffer (the
one you leave to edit the alternate file) is modified, and not open in
an
Reply to message «Re: edit alternate file -- e!# vs b!#»,
sent 18:18:38 24 April 2011, Sunday
by Tony Mechelynck:
> Don't forget that with an exclamation mark, if your current buffer (the
> one you leave to edit the alternate file) is modified, and not open in
> another window, al
On 24/04/11 02:41, Bee wrote:
On Apr 23, 5:00 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
On 04/23/2011 11:54 AM, Bee wrote:
To edit the alternate file, is there any difference between these:
nnoremap ,g :e!#
nnoremap ,g :b!#
While there may be other differences, you can edit unnamed
buffers with ":b!#" whi
On Apr 23, 5:00 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 04/23/2011 11:54 AM, Bee wrote:
>
> > To edit the alternate file, is there any difference between these:
>
> > nnoremap ,g :e!#
>
> > nnoremap ,g :b!#
>
> While there may be other differences, you can edit unnamed
> buffers with ":b!#" while ":e!#" require
On 04/23/2011 11:54 AM, Bee wrote:
To edit the alternate file, is there any difference between these:
nnoremap ,g :e!#
nnoremap ,g :b!#
While there may be other differences, you can edit unnamed
buffers with ":b!#" while ":e!#" requires that the file exist.
Additionally, if the file on-disk
To edit the alternate file, is there any difference between these:
nnoremap ,g :e!#
nnoremap ,g :b!#
-Bill
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
