Re: Hi-Spec IIci finished

>From: Cameron Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Hi-Spec IIci finished >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from Marten van de Kraats >at "Aug 20, 2 10:52:14 pm" >Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:24:10 -0700 (PDT) >My 'pimped' IIci "only" has an 8*24*GC, a 1GB Seag

Re: iCab 2.8

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: iCab 2.8 > >iCab 2.8 is out and it sports a KILLER new image/cookie/everything else >filter manager. The learning curve is a bit steeper than it was before but >I think it's a huge improvement over the old one. Being a preferences >junkie, maybe t

Re: Mac tools 3 or Norton utilities 3.1

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Mac tools 3 or Norton utilities 3.1 > >Hi, > Which is the most usefull for an se/30 and a performa 630 Mac tools 3 >and/or Norton utilities 3.1? The se/30 runs system 7.1 and the performa 630 >runs 7.5. I don't know anything about

Re: Too many errors

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Too many errors > >At 21:14 -0400 on 28/09/01, rlf wrote: > >>I liked 3.04 Gold, and 3.0.4 was the last version offered which would >>sort bookmarks alphabetically for ya. I still have a stripped-down > >

Re: Too many errors

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Too many errors > >Did you ever USE 3.04? It sucked. > > I liked 3.04 Gold, and 3.0.4 was the last version offered which would sort bookmarks alphabetically for ya. I still have a stripped-down version which I keep in one machine just in order

Re: Old Powerbooks and batteries

>From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Old Powerbooks and batteries >> That sounds like a problem with the power management >> circuitry. >> > >I know there's a trick to resetting the power manager, >but since I've never actually ownwed one, I'm not >100% certain how to do it.

Re: IMAP mail clients

>Subject: Re: IMAP mail clients >From: Amber Rhea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Poking around the web a little more yielded a program called "Mail Drop" >which looked promising - unfortunately I can find it available only in >Spanish. (Yeah, I should probably use it to pr

Re: "Looking Inside the Macintosh IIfx"

>Subject: Re: "Looking Inside the Macintosh IIfx" > >At 21:39 +0200 on 18/09/01, STEFAN DAEHLER wrote: > >>All-right, I got a lot of good ideas from your side, and this is what I >>found out so far: >> >>VideoWorks 4.0 by MacroMind is the ancestor of >>MacroMind Director which is the ancestor of >

OT: County Fairs

>From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: OT: County Fairs. Re: Eudora > >This year's theme for the Western Idaho Fair was >"2001: A Fair Odyssey". The billboards and posters >all had a pig sitting in a flying saucer on them. :P Amazin'. . Googling is b

Re: transferring files

Vintage Macs wrote ... >Subject: transferring files >From: Tracy Keirns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I am setting up a Mac for someone that wants to upgrade. She has an LC, and >I am fixing up an LC 475 for her. How do I transfer the files from her hard >drive to th

Re: Education Software for 68030 Macs.From: "A.Tuazon"

Vintage Macs wrote ... >Subject: Re: Education Software for 68030 Macs.From: "A.Tuazon" >From: "A.Tuazon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I'm looking for software that runs on a IIsi (68030). I have 65MB of RAM, a >500MB HD and a 8X CD-ROM. I'm looking for specifically

Re: 800K floppies

>From: "Andrew W. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: 800K floppies > >>Whoa. I thought you were getting rid of everything 'cause your Mom was >>about >>to toss it or you out. What happened down there this summer? What clever >>ruse did you employ to get your way once again? Do you fill your

Re: Stuffit Expander

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Stuffit Expander > >At 18:59 -0400 on 29/08/01, rlf wrote: > >>hehe. I forgot about trying that! Which resource? Searching through >>resex's hacks is an endless chase. > >Try the vers resources in

Re: Stuffit Expander

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Stuffit Expander > > >--- rlf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [big snip] >> >> Gee...anyhow, el pickle says its just what >> some authors do to >> prevent on

Re: Frames?! You want frames?!

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: kill teh frames kill the frames!! > >Frames?! You want frames?! >HERE! > >http://www.zark.com/headscape/frames.html > >;-) Ha, that's a riot! Bob F -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and...

Re: Stuffit Expander

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Stuffit Expander > >--- rlf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Vintage Macs wrote... >> >> >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >Subject: Re: Stu

Re: Deltis 230MO

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: "Andrew W. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Deltis 230MO > >>Grab this. >>http://www.ruralnetwork.net/~gregg/TutboMO.sit > >That should be "TurboMO.sit" right? >Peace ...unless you want the ancient Egyptian version. Bob F -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <

Re: 800K floppies

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: "Andrew W. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: 800K floppies > >Number of computers in my room = 10... > >Computers fill about 30% of the volume (not floor space) of my >10x12x7 bedroom. Work your way back from there > Whoa. I thought you were getting rid of e

Re: Posting Suggestions? (was Musings)

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Andrew Michael MacTao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Posting Suggestions? (was Musings) > >-- ><>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< >Since Judgement Day has now come and gone, it is now up to >those who have not passed this test, over the next f

Re: Stuffit Expander

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Stuffit Expander > >Stock 7.1 has Finder 7.1, which isn't scriptable. If I'm using the 7.1.3 Finder and an app won't open but instead displays a message saying it can't run without a scriptable Finder, does that re

Re: Multiple system folders

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: Re: Multiple system folders >On Sunday, August 26, 2001, at 10:25 AM, Amber Rhea wrote: > > >I'll search version tracker for System Switcher, thanks for mentioning >it. >-- >*** Amber Rhea *** > It's actually called SystemSwitcher 1.1. An alternative is Apple's

Re: sort of about blinking ?

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Jim Raper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: sort of about blinking ? > >Well, folks, > >I went in armed with a few of your suggestions. The first 'puter I tried >Norton's on said I couldn't use it and to try the #2 utilities disk from >the 7.5.3 install set. It boot

Re: Blinking ? on disk

>From: Jim Raper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Blinking ? on disk > >Hello, y'all, > >Early season question for the list. I'm the person with the Mac lab of >LCII's, 575's, and 580's. When the teacher whose room houses the lab >went in a few days prior to the opening of school, she and a student >

Re: System 7.5.2 (Powerbook 190) Net Install

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: System 7.5.2 (Powerbook 190) Net Install >From: Amber Rhea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Where can I find a Net Install download for system 7.5.2 (for Powerbook 190) >- not individual disk images. Thanks in advance! > > >-- >Amber Rhea

Re: NFS

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: NFS > >At 13:06 -0400 on 18/08/01, rlf wrote: > >>Yes, please, like how do you set said disk cache? Seriously. I have no > >Memory Control Panel. > >p Shucks, I plum forgot. Just

Re: NFS

>Subject: NFS >From: "R.A. Cantrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> One of the Cameron Kaiser's wrote: >> >> A useful hack you might not know is to always have a 768k disk cache,... >> >> Yeah, It's something about forcing the system to use all of the on-board >> RAM

Re: Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: Re: Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1 >From: Alex Allee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On the Photoshop 2.5 vs 2.5.1 issue: > >I had the book to 2.5/2.5.1 at one point, and ISTR it saying that 2.5.1 was >to support System 7 better. > >I may be wrong

Re: Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Judson) >Subject: Re: Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1 >Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 14:20:53 -0500 (CDT) > >> Greetings, all... >> >> Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I >> want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't

Photoshop 2.5 to 2.5.1

Greetings, all... Would someone please tell me the difference between PS 2.5 and 2.5.1? I want to use 2.5 in some vintage Macs but don't know what the .1 update enabled and whether that would even have a bearing on what I want to do. I don't have the updater and haven't found any decent info o

Re: Where can I find a FTP program...

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Where can I find a FTP program for the Mac II and a power PC > I need both? > >At 16:29 -0700 on 15/08/01, Gary Adams wrote: > >>Where can I find a FTP program for the Mac II and a power PC I need both, > >Get Fetch. Fre

LaCie FM Radio Tuner

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: LaCie FM Radio Tuner >From: Sam Burrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Does anyone have the software/drivers for the LaCie FM Radio Tuner? I >checked VersionTracker, LaCie's web site, and download.com to no avail. > >I would like to get m

Re: My List

>Subject: Re: My List Okay, here's my list of working oldies: PB170 PB180 PB180c PB190 PB190cs PB5300c Plus SE FDHD SE/30 Classic II Color Classic Color Classic-Mystic LC LCII LCIII IIsi IIfx Gee, I never counted them before. Shocking. That doesn't include the ones that don't work (yet) of c

Re: Mac SE no boot disk

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: "Andrew W. Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Mac SE no boot disk > >>Help a friend just dropped a MAC SE on me and when I >>turn it on it ask for a floppy. Where might I find OS >>disks for this system? Do I have to purchase from >>apple or are older versions

Re: Xceed video card

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: Xceed video card > >At 18:00 -0400 on 18/07/01, Amber Rhea wrote: > >>The card is model(?) number NB6-48, and then below that 250-0306 [blank > >Anything with an NB in it is a NuBus model. They're essentially worthless. >I have one, and it's no

Re: ditching the PDF version [was] pickel's Mac FAQ

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: pickel's Mac FAQ > > >I'm actually considering ditching the PDF version because of formatting >problems with older versions of Acrobat. Good thought, p. Go fer it. Bob F -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and... Small

Re: MAC IIsi ROM chip needed

>From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: MAC IIsi ROM chip needed > >At 15:05 -0400 on 09/07/01, rlf wrote: > >>Er, I bought a good one last week for $7.50 via the swap list. I realise >>that's more than the IIsi itself is worth, but I just had

Re: System 7.5.3

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Gregg Eshelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: System 7.5.3 > > >Far as I know, the 7.5.3 to 7.5.5 update "broke" >more stuff than any other System or Mac OS update. >I think there used to be lists of software that >needed updates for 7.5.5, and more important, >s

Re: LCIII Utilities Disk

Vintage Macs wrote... >Subject: Re: LCIII Utilities Disk >From: roland drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Dear List: > >I have an old version of Norton Utilities (version 2.0) from which I would >like to make an Emergency Floppy Disk. The two Emergency disks which I h

Re: MAC IIsi ROM chip needed

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: the pickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: MAC IIsi ROM chip needed > >At 15:32 -0500 on 08/07/01, Lloyd Davies wrote: > >>I am in need of a 512k ROM SIMM for a MAC IIsi - Need to get to get one up >>and running for me to sell. Another question, what does a MAC

Re: After Dark Fragmentation?

Vintage Macs wrote... >From: Andrew Michael MacTao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: After Dark Fragmentation? > >Bob F. wrote: >>Not really: 27 file fragments is not 27 fragmented files. If there are >>but 27 file fragments, how can there be many times that number of free >>space fragments? Fr