Re: Benchmarks and Daystars

2002-08-20 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Cameron Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some of the tests ran on my classic Mac stable had rather startling results. For example, the Daystar PowerCentral control panel seems to accelerate FPU performance on the IIci, even with no Daystar hardware installed. Apparently you had the

Re: Benchmarks and Daystars

2002-08-20 Thread Cameron Kaiser
For example, the Daystar PowerCentral control panel seems to accelerate FPU performance on the IIci, even with no Daystar hardware installed. Apparently you had the PowerMath switch on. That redirects any SANE math calls normally processed by the CPU to the FPU. It works even with an

Re: Benchmarks and Daystars

2002-08-20 Thread Gamba
From: Cameron Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] but it seems strange that SANE wouldn't do that already on the IIci. Doesn't SANE use the FPU if present? I have a dim recollection of reading that it depends on which OS it is. You might add OS versions to your suite of tests. :-) Gamba

Re: Benchmarks and Daystars

2002-08-20 Thread Cameron Kaiser
but it seems strange that SANE wouldn't do that already on the IIci. Doesn't SANE use the FPU if present? I have a dim recollection of reading that it depends on which OS it is. You might add OS versions to your suite of tests. :-) I did find OS differences, yes -- the SE/30's FPU score

Benchmarks and Daystars

2002-08-19 Thread Cameron Kaiser
While trying to benchmark Fusion PC (as a IIci) on my AMD DOS PC, I threw together a small implementation of the Sieve of Eratosthenes and Ahl's Simple Benchmark to test integer and FPU performance. Like everything else in my life, this snowballed, so here is the fruit of my labours for people