Marten from the Kraats wrote:
I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
I have no direct answer to your question. But, since the concept
of interleave perplexed me for so many years... I thought I'd toss
in a few words
I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
Thanks,
Marten
--
Check out the System 6 Heaven:
http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html
Subscribe to the LEM system6 list
At 23:40 +0200 on 04/09/01, Marten van de Kraats wrote:
I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
Won't matter, especially if it's a fast HD, because the HD's own buffer
will take care of any issues that might have arisen from interleaving
At 23:40 +0200 on 04/09/01, Marten van de Kraats wrote:
I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
Won't matter, especially if it's a fast HD, because the HD's own buffer
will take care of any issues that might have arisen from interleaving
--- Marten van de Kraats [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying a pretty fast hard disk in a LC... Which
format
interleave is the best: 1, 2, 3, 4???
1:1 interleave is fine for all Macs except the Plus
and SE. The Plus normally uses 3:1 and the SE 2:1
but that isn't really a factor with newer
