;d appreciate clarification.
>
> Thanks. Keith
>
> -Original Message-
> From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Raul A. Gallegos
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:25 PM
> To: viphone@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Accessi
The app is great
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2012, at 7:24 PM, "Raul A. Gallegos" wrote:
> I think this boils down to accessible verses usable. Some feel that if an app
> doesn't conform 100% to Voice Over standards then it's not accessible. Others
> feel that if they can use the app wit
2012 7:25 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Accessible VS Usable -- Was Re: [Maccessibility] Google Releases
Official YouTube App
I think this boils down to accessible verses usable. Some feel that if
an app doesn't conform 100% to Voice Over standards then it's not
accessible. Oth
I think this boils down to accessible verses usable. Some feel that if
an app doesn't conform 100% to Voice Over standards then it's not
accessible. Others feel that if they can use the app with minimal fuss,
then it's accessible. Then comes that grey area of defining what is
minimal fuss.
Fo
