Re: [virtio-dev] queue_enable vs QueueReady

2020-05-28 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/5/28 下午10:00, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:06:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: Hi: I found ambiguity in the virtio specification: In PCI part, it describes the queue_enable as: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing requests from

[virtio-dev] Re: VIRTIO RPMB Front End drivers for Linux

2020-05-28 Thread Alex Bennée
Winkler, Tomas writes: > Hi, yes the OASIS spec is based around this ACRN solution. We are still > planning on another Linux kernel submission effort, actually in the next > release cycle. > The capability message which is not implemented in the virtio solution is due > to NVMe support,

Re: [virtio-dev] queue_enable vs QueueReady

2020-05-28 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:06:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Hi: > > I found ambiguity in the virtio specification: > > In PCI part, it describes the queue_enable as: > > The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing > requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 -

[virtio-dev] queue_enable vs QueueReady

2020-05-28 Thread Jason Wang
Hi: I found ambiguity in the virtio specification: In PCI part, it describes the queue_enable as: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. In MMIO part, it describes the QueueReady as: Writing one (0x1)

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Support virtio cross-device resources

2020-05-28 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:58:08PM +0900, David Stevens wrote: > This patchset implements the current proposal for virtio cross-device > resource sharing [1]. It will be used to import virtio resources into > the virtio-video driver currently under discussion [2]. The patch > under consideration