[virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH RFC] VIRTIO_F_PARTIAL_ORDER for page fault handling

> From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org open.org> On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: 14. august 2020 01:18 > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 03:55:18PM +0000, Lars Ganrot wrote: > > > From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org > > > On Behalf Of Cornelia Huck

[virtio-dev] RE: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH RFC] VIRTIO_F_PARTIAL_ORDER for page fault handling

> From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org open.org> On Behalf Of Cornelia Huck > Sent: 12. august 2020 14:51 > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:43:44 +0000 > Lars Ganrot wrote: > > > > From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org > > > On Behalf Of Lars G

RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH RFC] VIRTIO_F_PARTIAL_ORDER for page fault handling

> From: virtio-comm...@lists.oasis-open.org open.org> On Behalf Of Lars Ganrot > Sent: 11. august 2020 16:54 > > > From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: 11. august 2020 10:23 > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 202

RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH RFC] VIRTIO_F_PARTIAL_ORDER for page fault handling

Hi Michael, Short comment below. BR, -Lars > From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org On > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: 11. august 2020 10:23 > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 06:59:28PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:15:15 -0400 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > >

RE: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] acknowledgements: add commenters from mailing list

acle \newline > +Karandeep Chahal,DDN \newline > Kevin Lo,MSI \newline > +Kevin Tian, Intel \newline > +Kully Dhanoa,Intel \newline > Laura Novich, Red Hat\newline > Ladi Prosek, Red Hat \newline > +Lars Ganrot, Napatech\newline > Longpen

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] acknowledgements: add members and non-members

Correct. Thank you, Sir! Best Regards, -Lars -Original Message- From: Michael S. Tsirkin Sent: 28. marts 2019 18:36 To: Lars Ganrot Cc: vir...@lists.oasis-open.org; virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v2] acknowledgements: add members and non-members

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Sent: 4. april 2018 18:08 > To: Lars Ganrot <l...@napatech.com> > Cc: vir...@lists.oasis-open.org; virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature > > On Wed,

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Sent: 3. april 2018 13:48 > To: Lars Ganrot <l...@napatech.com> > Cc: vir...@lists.oasis-open.org; virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature > > On Tue,

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature

> From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org <virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org> On > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: 29. marts 2018 21:13 > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 06:23:28PM +, Lars Ganrot wrote: > > > > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature

Missed replying to the lists. Sorry. > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > Sent: 28. marts 2018 16:39 > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 08:23:38AM +, Lars Ganrot wrote: > > Hi Michael et al > > > > > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > > Sent:

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH v10 13/13] split-ring: in order feature

Hi Michael et al > Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: 9. marts 2018 22:24 > > For a split ring, require that drivers use descriptors in order too. > This allows devices to skip reading the available ring. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC] packed ring layout spec v5

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com] > Sent: 28. november 2017 15:37 > > If the device always returns buffers in order, then couldn't the driver > > skip the > >step of reading the used.ring for read-only buffers (e.g. TX for net > >devices)? The > >used.idx tells how many

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC] packed ring layout spec v5

Hi Michael and others, Hopefully my question below follows the forum format. BR, -Lars > > \subsection{In-order use of descriptors} \label{sec:Packed Virtqueues / > In-order > use of descriptors} > > Some devices always use descriptors in the same order in which they have been > made

RE: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RFC] packed ring layout spec v4

Hi Michael, Added comments inline labeled [#lga#]. BR, -Lars > -Original Message- > From: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: 8. november 2017 13:28 > To: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject:

Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v3

Hi Michael, I'm trying to understand your Sep 28 13:32 example (text copied below). I've in-lined my questions [#lga#]. > > Let's assume device promised to consume packets in order > > ring size = 2 > > Ring is 0 initialized. > > Device initially polls DESC[0].flags for WRAP bit to change. > >