On 9/7/2023 2:34 AM, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
On 9/7/2023 4:09 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 11:08 AM Zhu, Lingshan
wrote:
On 8/21/2023 5:26 PM, Eugenio Perez Martin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:44 AM Zhu, Lingshan
wrote:
On 8/17/2023 11:19 PM, Eugenio Pere
On 1/25/2023 3:46 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Parav Pandit
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 6:31 PM
To: Michael S. Tsirkin ; Halil Pasic
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 3:56 PM
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 07:04:54PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
+
+When VIRTIO_NET_
://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/147
Suggested-by: Si-Wei Liu
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit
Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu
-Siwei
---
changelog:
v7->v8:
- Fixed grammar
v6->v7:
- Moved VLAN filter table description from requirements to device
descrption section
- Added MUST and SHO
] https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg912392.html
Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/147
Suggested-by: Si-Wei Liu
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit
---
changelog:
v2->v3:
- corrected grammar
- simplified description for untagged packets
v1->v2:
- adapt to ne
On 9/7/2022 3:11 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 5:40 PM
On 9/7/2022 12:51 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
And I'd like commit log to include results of perf testing
- with indirect feature on
Which device do you suggest using for this test?
Yo
On 9/7/2022 12:51 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
And I'd like commit log to include results of perf testing
- with indirect feature on
Which device do you suggest using for this test?
You may use software vhost-net backend with and without fix to compare.
Since this driver fix effectively lowers d
be a better name than big_packets_sg_num, where the comment could be
written as "number of skb fragments for big packets" rather than "number
of sg entries allocated for big packets".
Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu
+
/* Host will merge rx buffers for big p
On 8/29/2022 7:26 PM, Gavin Li wrote:
Probe routine is already several hundred lines.
Use helper function for guest gso support check.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Li
Reviewed-by: Gavi Teitz
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit
Reviewed-by: Si-Wei Liu
---
changelog:
v1->v2
- Add new patch
---
driv
On 8/26/2022 9:41 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2022 4:52 AM
Sorry for the delay. Didn't notice as this thread was not addressed to my work
email. Please copy to my work email if it needs my immediate attention.
Can you please setup
Sorry for the delay. Didn't notice as this thread was not addressed to
my work email. Please copy to my work email if it needs my immediate
attention.
On 8/25/2022 5:38 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big
packets even when GUEST_* offloads a
On 8/9/2022 11:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 02:14:07AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 04:24:23PM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
On 8/9/2022 3:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 6:26 PM
To
On 8/9/2022 3:49 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 6:26 PM
To: Parav Pandit
Cc: Si-Wei Liu ; Jason Wang
; Gavin Li ; Hemminger,
Stephen ; davem
; virtualization ; Virtio-Dev ;
jesse.brandeb...@intel.com; alexander.h.du...@intel.com;
kubak
On 8/9/2022 3:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 03:32:26PM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
On 8/9/2022 2:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:18:30PM +, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:09 PM
From: Si-Wei Liu
On 8/9/2022 2:37 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 07:18:30PM +, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:09 PM
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 2:39 PM Currently it is not. Not a
single patch nor this patch, but the
On 8/9/2022 2:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 11:38:52AM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
On 8/9/2022 12:44 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:07 PM Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/9/2022 7:56 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or
On 8/9/2022 12:18 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 3:09 PM
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 2:39 PM Currently it is not. Not a
single patch nor this patch, but the context for the eventual goal is
to allow XDP on a MTU=9000 link when
On 8/9/2022 11:42 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 2:39 PM
Currently it is not. Not a single patch nor this patch, but the context for the
eventual goal is to allow XDP on a MTU=9000 link when guest users
intentionally lower down MTU to 1500.
Which
On 8/9/2022 12:44 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 3:07 PM Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/9/2022 7:56 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 8/8/2022 12:31 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/6/2022 6:11 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use
On 8/9/2022 12:06 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/9/2022 7:56 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 8/8/2022 12:31 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/6/2022 6:11 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 8/1/2022 9:45
On 8/8/2022 12:31 AM, Gavin Li wrote:
On 8/6/2022 6:11 AM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On 8/1/2022 9:45 PM, Gavin Li wrote:
Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big
packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not
On 8/5/2022 3:11 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
On 8/1/2022 9:45 PM, Gavin Li wrote:
Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big
packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not present on the device.
However, if GSO is not supported,
GUEST GSO (virtio term), or GRO HW (netdev
On 8/1/2022 9:45 PM, Gavin Li wrote:
Currently add_recvbuf_big() allocates MAX_SKB_FRAGS segments for big
packets even when GUEST_* offloads are not present on the device.
However, if GSO is not supported,
GUEST GSO (virtio term), or GRO HW (netdev core term) it should have
been be called.
On 3/1/2019 5:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 05:30:56PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/28/2019 6:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:32:12AM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
Will the
change break userspace further?
-Siwei
Didn't you
On 2/28/2019 6:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:32:12AM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
Will the
change break userspace further?
-Siwei
Didn't you show userspace is already broken. You can't "further
break it", rename already fails.
It's a race
On 2/27/2019 4:41 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:38:00PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/27/2019 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:34:56PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/27/2019 2:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at
On 2/27/2019 3:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:34:56PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/27/2019 2:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:17:21PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/25/2019 6:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at
On 2/27/2019 2:38 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:17:21PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/25/2019 6:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:58:07PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at
On 2/27/2019 1:57 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:17:21 -0800
si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/25/2019 6:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:58:07PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:55
On 2/25/2019 6:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 05:39:12PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Moreover, you were suggesting hiding the lower slave devices anyway. There was
some discussion
about moving them to a hidden network namespace so that they are not visible
from
On 2/25/2019 6:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:58:07PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:55:11PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/21/2019 11:00 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 2/21/2019 7:33 PM
On 2/22/2019 7:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:55:11PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/21/2019 11:00 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 2/21/2019 7:33 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/21/2019 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:14:44PM -0800
On 2/21/2019 11:00 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 2/21/2019 7:33 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 2/21/2019 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:14:44PM -0800, Siwei Liu wrote:
Sorry for replying to this ancient thread. There was some remaining
issue that I don&#
On 2/21/2019 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:14:44PM -0800, Siwei Liu wrote:
Sorry for replying to this ancient thread. There was some remaining
issue that I don't think the initial net_failover patch got addressed
cleanly, see:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
On 01/10/2019 07:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 06:09:23PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 01/09/2019 07:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:29:41PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
diff --git a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
index 80d42e1
On 01/09/2019 05:39 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 08:55:35PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 1/7/2019 6:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:45:22PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 01/07/2019 03:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote
On 01/09/2019 07:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:29:41PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
diff --git a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
index 80d42e1..2a3ffd3 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/pcihp.c
@@ -176,6 +176,25 @@ static void acpi_pcihp_eject_slot(Acp
On 1/7/2019 6:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:45:22PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 01/07/2019 03:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 05:29:39PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
Implement the infrastructure to support datapath switching during live
management software wants to drive the SR-IOV live
migration on its own. It should not conflict with the hidden device
model but just offers simplicity of implementation.
Si-Wei Liu (2):
vfio-pci: Add FAILOVER_PRIMARY_CHANGED event to shorten downtime during
failover
pci: query
On 01/07/2019 03:41 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:22:20 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:17:17PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:29:43 -0500
Venu Busireddy wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
When a VF is hotplugge
On 12/10/2018 9:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:15:48AM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
From: Si-Wei Liu
When a VF is hotplugged into the guest, datapath switching will be
performed immediately, which is sub-optimal in terms of timing, and
could end up with
On 12/10/2018 9:41 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:15:47AM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
Added two new events, FAILOVER_PLUG_PRIMARY and FAILOVER_UNPLUG_PRIMARY.
The first is emitted when the guest negotiates the F_STANDBY feature
bit. The second is emitted when the vi
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:59 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 06:09:19PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
I agree. But a single flag is not much of an extension. We don't even
need it in netlink, can be anywhere in e.g. sysfs.
I think sysfs attribute is for exposing the cap
On 11/29/2018 10:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:53:08PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/29/2018 1:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:14:46PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 5:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018
On 11/29/2018 07:08 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/29/2018 4:24 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/29/2018 3:53 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/29/2018 2:53 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/29/2018 1:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:14:46PM -0800, si-wei liu
On 11/29/2018 3:53 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/29/2018 2:53 PM, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/29/2018 1:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:14:46PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 5:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:28:42PM
On 11/29/2018 1:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:14:46PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 5:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:28:42PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 12:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018
On 11/28/2018 5:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:28:42PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 12:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:39:55AM -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/28/2018 9:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov
On 11/28/2018 12:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:28:42PM -0800, si-wei liu wrote:
On 11/28/2018 12:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:39:55AM -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/28/2018 9:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov
On 11/28/2018 12:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:39:55AM -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/28/2018 9:35 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:31:32AM -0800, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 11/28/2018 9:08 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon
On 7/9/2018 6:00 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 03:27:23PM -0700, si-wei liu wrote:
On 7/3/2018 2:58 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
So how is this coordination going to work? One possibility is that the
PV device emits a QMP event upon the guest driver confirming the support
for
On 7/3/2018 2:58 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:14:52PM -0700, si-wei liu wrote:
On 7/2/2018 9:14 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:19:03PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
The patch set "Enable virtio_net to act as a standby for a passthru
device"
On 7/2/2018 9:14 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:19:03PM -0500, Venu Busireddy wrote:
The patch set "Enable virtio_net to act as a standby for a passthru
device" [1] deals with live migration of guests that use passthrough
devices. However, that scheme uses the MAC address f
0:58:80,backup=pci.2:0x3
...
-device vfio-pci,host=02:10.1,id=hostdev0,bus=pci.2,addr=0x3
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu
---
hw/net/virtio-net.c | 29 -
include/hw/pci/pci.h| 3 ++
include/hw/virtio/virtio-net.h | 2 +
incl
g
its and : location. Changing BACKUP feature
to take these configs into account, such that verifying target
device for auto-enslavement no longer relies on the MAC address.
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c| 159
include/uapi/
slave, and making it persistent
across live migration. And so on..
The current patch series is based on Sridhar's v4 patch "Enable virtio to act
as a backup for a passthru device", but I can resync anyway to his upcoming
version once posted.
Si-Wei Liu (1):
qemu: virtio
h ':' can rightly be used as the namescope for
the kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevs.
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 12 ++
include/net/net_namespace.h | 2 +
net/core/dev.c | 281 ++--
net/core/net_n
56 matches
Mail list logo
