Hi Eric,
On 03/10/17 14:04, Auger Eric wrote:
> When rebasing the v0.4 driver on master I observe a regression: commands
> are not received properly by QEMU (typically an attach command is
> received with a type of 0). After a bisection of the guest kernel the
> first commit the problem appears
Hi Jean,
On 04/08/2017 20:19, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> This is the continuation of my proposal for virtio-iommu, the para-
> virtualized IOMMU. Here is a summary of the changes since last time [1]:
>
> * The virtio-iommu document now resembles an actual specification. It is
> split into
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 6, 2017 7:49 PM
>
>
> > 2.6.8.2.1
> > Multiple overlapping RESV_MEM properties are merged together. Device
> > requirement? if same types I assume?
>
> Combination rules apply to device and driver.
redhat.com; kevin.t...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] [RFC] virtio-iommu version 0.4
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> On 16/08/17 05:08, Adam Tao wrote:
> >> * There is a working Qemu prototype [3], thanks to Eric Auger and Bharat
> >> Bhushan.
> > Hi, Brucker
&g
Hi Adam,
On 16/08/17 05:08, Adam Tao wrote:
>> * There is a working Qemu prototype [3], thanks to Eric Auger and Bharat
>> Bhushan.
> Hi, Brucker
> I read the related spec for virtio IOMMU,
> I am wondering if we support both the virtual and physical devices in
> the guest to use the virtio
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:19:25PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> This is the continuation of my proposal for virtio-iommu, the para-
> virtualized IOMMU. Here is a summary of the changes since last time [1]:
>
> * The virtio-iommu document now resembles an actual specification. It is
>
