> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:19 PM
>
> On 22/08/17 07:24, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> >>> (sorry to pick up this old thread, as the .tex one is not good for review
> >>> and this thread provides necessary background for IOASID).
On 22/08/17 07:24, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> (sorry to pick up this old thread, as the .tex one is not good for review
>>> and this thread provides necessary background for IOASID).
>>>
>>> Hi, Jean,
>>>
>>> I'd like to hear more clarification regarding the relationship between
>>> IOASID and PASID.
On 21/04/17 10:02, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 2:46 AM
>>
>> On 18/04/17 11:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
>>> [...]
II.
On 18/04/17 11:26, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
>> Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 3:18 AM
>>
> [...]
>> II. Feature bits
>>
>>
>> VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_INPUT_RANGE (0)
>> Available range of virtual addresses is described in input_range
>
> Usually only the
