[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Nitesh Narayan Lal
On 10/2/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: [...] >>> My suggestion would be to look at reworking the patch set and >>> post numbers for my patch set versus the bitmap approach and we can >>> look at them then. >> Agreed. However, in order to fix an issue I have to reproduce it first. > With the

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:19 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > On 10/7/19 11:33 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 08:29 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > > > On 10/2/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > > [...] > > > You don't have to, I can fix the issues in my

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Nitesh Narayan Lal
On 10/7/19 11:33 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 08:29 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: >> On 10/2/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> [...] >> You don't have to, I can fix the issues in my patch-set. :) >>> Sounds good. Hopefully the stuff I pointed out above helps you to

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] [RFC RESEND] vdec: Add virtio video decode device specification

2019-10-07 Thread Dmitry Morozov
Hello, We at OpenSynergy are also working on an abstract paravirtualized video streaming device that operates input and/or output data buffers and can be used as a generic video decoder/encoder/input/output device. We would be glad to share our thoughts and contribute to the discussion.

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] [RFC RESEND] vdec: Add virtio video decode device specification

2019-10-07 Thread Dmitry Morozov
Hi Tomasz, On Montag, 7. Oktober 2019 16:14:13 CEST Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Dmitry Morozov > > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > We at OpenSynergy are also working on an abstract paravirtualized video > > streaming device that operates input and/or output

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] [RFC RESEND] vdec: Add virtio video decode device specification

2019-10-07 Thread Tomasz Figa
Hi Dmitry, On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:01 PM Dmitry Morozov wrote: > > Hello, > > We at OpenSynergy are also working on an abstract paravirtualized video > streaming device that operates input and/or output data buffers and can be > used > as a generic video decoder/encoder/input/output device. >

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 08:29 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > On 10/2/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > [...] > > > > My suggestion would be to look at reworking the patch set and > > > > post numbers for my patch set versus the bitmap approach and we can > > > > look at them then. > > >

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:07 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > > > On 10/7/19 12:27 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:19 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: > >> On 10/7/19 11:33 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 08:29 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: >

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: document VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ multiqueue feature

2019-10-07 Thread Matti Moell
Hi Stefan, I wasn't able to find any discussion about not including multiqueue in the spec and this patch was never applied, is there any particular reason why it wasn't added? Should it even be added to the spec? Cheers, Matti On 19.05.16 20:53, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v11 0/6] mm / virtio: Provide support for unused page reporting

2019-10-07 Thread Nitesh Narayan Lal
On 10/7/19 12:27 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 12:19 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: >> On 10/7/19 11:33 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> On Mon, 2019-10-07 at 08:29 -0400, Nitesh Narayan Lal wrote: On 10/2/19 10:25 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> [...] You