> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> Sent: 28. november 2017 15:37
> > If the device always returns buffers in order, then couldn't the driver
> > skip the
> >step of reading the used.ring for read-only buffers (e.g. TX for net
> >devices)? The
> >used.idx tells how many
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 07:55:53PM +, Lars Ganrot wrote:
> Hi Michael and others,
>
> Hopefully my question below follows the forum format.
>
> BR,
>
> -Lars
> >
> > \subsection{In-order use of descriptors} \label{sec:Packed Virtqueues /
> > In-order
> > use of descriptors}
> >
> > Some
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:00:39AM +, Dhanoa, Kully wrote:
> I've embedded my original comments in the text below for archiving purposes.
>
> Michael,
> I could not find your responses to my comments in the document.
>
> If you could provide them, it would help me to understand the proposal
Hi Michael and others,
Hopefully my question below follows the forum format.
BR,
-Lars
>
> \subsection{In-order use of descriptors} \label{sec:Packed Virtqueues /
> In-order
> use of descriptors}
>
> Some devices always use descriptors in the same order in which they have been
> made
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:00:39AM +, Dhanoa, Kully wrote:
> I've embedded my original comments in the text below for archiving purposes.
>
> Michael,
> I could not find your responses to my comments in the document.
>
> If you could provide them, it would help me to understand the proposal
I've embedded my original comments in the text below for archiving purposes.
Michael,
I could not find your responses to my comments in the document.
If you could provide them, it would help me to understand the proposal better.
Thanks
Kully
-Original Message-
From:
