[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

2018-02-12 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100 Halil Pasic wrote: s/precise/precise about/ > Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as virtio 1.0. This > could become confusing when we bump the version of the virtio > specification to 1.1, in a sense that it could be

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/2] introduction: simplify the designation of legacy

2018-02-12 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:14 +0100 Halil Pasic wrote: > The sentence designating the documents defining what later > became known as the legacy virtio interface had the most > important piece of information placed in parenthesis. > > Let's reword this sentence so we

[virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH v7 09/11] content: in-order buffer use

2018-02-12 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:01:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Using descriptors in-order is sometimes benefitial. Add an option for > that - per-format detail allowing more optimizations will be added by > follow-up patches. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- >

[virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH v7 11/11] split-ring: in order feature

2018-02-12 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:01:09AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > For a split ring, require that drivers use descriptors in order too. > This allows devices to skip reading the available ring. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > split-ring.tex | 18

[virtio-dev] Re: [virtio] [PATCH v7 10/11] packed-ring: add in order support

2018-02-12 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:01:09AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Support in-order requests for packed rings. > This allows selective write-out of used descriptors. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > packed-ring.tex | 24 > 1 file

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/2] two versioning related changes

2018-02-12 Thread Halil Pasic
On 02/12/2018 02:03 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 22:43:23 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:59:12PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: >>> Regarding patch #1 please see also: >>>

[virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 0/2] two versioning related changes

2018-02-12 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 22:43:23 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 08:59:12PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > Regarding patch #1 please see also: > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio/201802/msg00018.html > > Fine by me. Can you please open an

Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

2018-02-12 Thread Halil Pasic
On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100 > Halil Pasic wrote: > > s/precise/precise about/ Nod. Should I spin a v2 or is it better handled via fixup by maintainer? > >> Revision 1 of the CCW transport is currently defined as

Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

2018-02-12 Thread Halil Pasic
On 02/12/2018 10:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: >> >> >> On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100 >>> Halil Pasic wrote: >>> >>> s/precise/precise about/ >> >>

Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ccw: be more precise the semantic of revision 1

2018-02-12 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 03:25:12PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote: > > > On 02/12/2018 01:59 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:13 +0100 > > Halil Pasic wrote: > > > > s/precise/precise about/ > > Nod. Should I spin a v2 or is it better handled > via