On Fri, 9 Feb 2018 20:59:14 +0100 Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The sentence designating the documents defining what later > became known as the legacy virtio interface had the most > important piece of information placed in parenthesis. > > Let's reword this sentence so we avoid using an ambiguous designation > based on a relative anchor (i.e. 'earlier drafts of this specification') > and just use the absolute anchor (version 1.0). > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > introduction.tex | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/introduction.tex b/introduction.tex > index 979881e..78c340d 100644 > --- a/introduction.tex > +++ b/introduction.tex > @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ The key words ``MUST'', ``MUST NOT'', ``REQUIRED'', > ``SHALL'', ``SHALL NOT'', `` > \subsection{Legacy Interface: Terminology}\label{intro:Legacy > Interface: Terminology} > > -Earlier drafts of this specification (i.e. revisions before 1.0, > -see e.g. \hyperref[intro:Virtio PCI Draft]{[Virtio PCI Draft]}) > +Specification drafts preceding version 1.0 of this specification > +(e.g. see \hyperref[intro:Virtio PCI Draft]{[Virtio PCI Draft]}) > defined a similar, but different > interface between the driver and the device. > Since these are widely deployed, this specification Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org