On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 06:01:56PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> In theory we shouldn't need to repeat so much boilerplate to support
> >> vhost-user backends. This provides a generic
Matias Ezequiel Vara Larsen writes:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> In theory we shouldn't need to repeat so much boilerplate to support
>> vhost-user backends. This provides a generic vhost-user-base QOM
>> object and a derived vhost-user-device for which the
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 04:35:09PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> In theory we shouldn't need to repeat so much boilerplate to support
> vhost-user backends. This provides a generic vhost-user-base QOM
> object and a derived vhost-user-device for which the user needs to
> provide the few bits of
> +static const TypeInfo vud_info = {
> +.name = TYPE_VHOST_USER_DEVICE,
> +.parent = TYPE_VHOST_USER_BASE,
> +.instance_size = sizeof(VHostUserBase),
> +.class_init = vud_class_init,
> +.class_size = sizeof(VHostUserBaseClass),
I wish you didn't tie the refactoring in with
