Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-23 Thread DRC
On 3/23/15 7:58 PM, Nathan Kidd wrote: > BTW, yes, you are correct. Multiple vglrun copies in the path is a very > similar problem to multiple librrfaker.so copies in the library search > order. It's a problem in theory, but in practice, people don't typically install multiple copies in their PA

Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-23 Thread Nathan Kidd
On 18/03/15 03:37 PM, DRC wrote: > I kept the basic idea of these patches but modified them in my own way > to be more project-friendly: > > -- It was necessary to modify vglrun so that it uses the custom > "rrfaker", "dlfaker", and "gefaker" strings. I assume that OpenText may > not be using

Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-21 Thread Nathan Kidd
On 18/03/15 03:37 PM, DRC wrote: > I kept the basic idea of these patches but modified them in my own way > to be more project-friendly: Got a chance to rebase on that tree: Works for me. Thanks. -Nathan -- Dive into

Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-18 Thread DRC
I kept the basic idea of these patches but modified them in my own way to be more project-friendly: -- It was necessary to modify vglrun so that it uses the custom "rrfaker", "dlfaker", and "gefaker" strings. I assume that OpenText may not be using vglrun (some vendors don't), which is why thi

Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-14 Thread Nathan Kidd
On 14/03/15 10:35 PM, DRC wrote: > I'll look into it. There are a couple of obvious bugs ("defaker" > instead of "dlfaker"), and I think I can make CMake do a little more > of the work instead of requiring so many ifdefs Sorry, looking at that 3rd patch again, besides s/defaker/dlfaker/ and DEFAKE

Re: [VirtualGL-Devel] Vendor Support Patches

2015-03-14 Thread DRC
I'll look into it. There are a couple of obvious bugs ("defaker" instead of "dlfaker"), and I think I can make CMake do a little more of the work instead of requiring so many ifdefs, but I agree that this is useful. There is at least one other remote display vendor now selling their own version