On 5/26/11 1:10 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote:
> Indeed my code is not going to do a refresh in this case, as the image is
> not idle. My position is that if an application behaves incorrectly it
> should be fixed, and a terminal with a blinking cursor is not an
> interesting use case for ALR anyway (if
On 11-05-26 02:08 AM, DRC wrote:
> I checked in the version output line. Unless you can tell me why it
> hurts anything for the shared memory segment ID to be printed first, I'm
> going to file that under "things that aren't going to be perfect."
If the aesthetic isn't interesting then the other
