(dropping netdev and the visws list)
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 11:07 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 22:45 +0100, David Miller wrote:
From: Ian Campbell ian.campb...@eu.citrix.com
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 10:55:55 +0100
You
(dropping netdev and visws list)
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:00 +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 04/06/2011 11:58 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
I'm not sure why ELAN belongs in the EXTENDED_PLATFORM option space
rather than in the CPU choice option, since its only impact seems to be
on -march,
On 04/07/2011 11:38 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Not really. The TSC register is a requirement, but that's going to be
present on any CPU which can boot Xen. We don't need any of the
kernel's TSC machinery though.
So why the Kconfig dependency then? In principal a kernel compiled for a
non-TSC
On 08.04.11 at 17:25, Jeremy Fitzhardinge jer...@goop.org wrote:
On 04/07/2011 11:38 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there any downside to this patch (is X86_CMPXCHG in the same sort of
boat?)
Only if we don't use cmpxchg in shared memory with other domains or the
hypervisor. (I don't think it
On 04/08/2011 08:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.04.11 at 17:25, Jeremy Fitzhardinge jer...@goop.org wrote:
On 04/07/2011 11:38 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Is there any downside to this patch (is X86_CMPXCHG in the same sort of
boat?)
Only if we don't use cmpxchg in shared memory with other
On 04/07/2011 11:46 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
Any reason not switch it over at this point then?
Not really.
-hpa
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
