Re: [PATCH resend] virtio_console: Free buffers from out-queue upon close

On (Thu) 08 Nov 2012 [10:28:53], Rusty Russell wrote: sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com writes: From: Sjur Brændeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com Free pending output buffers from the virtio out-queue when host has acknowledged port_close. Also removed WARN_ON() in remove_port_data().

Re: [PATCHv8 0/3]virtio_console: Add rproc_serial driver

On (Tue) 30 Oct 2012 [09:51:50], Sjur Brændeland wrote: From: Sjur Brændeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com This patch-set introduces a new virtio type rproc_serial for communicating with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the the remoteproc framework. As

[[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq at port removal

From: Sjur Brændeland sjur.brandel...@stericsson.com Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed. Rproc_serial communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave buffers in the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-queue as well, e.g. for

Re: [PATCH resend] virtio_console: Free buffers from out-queue upon close

Note: This patch is compile tested only. I have done the removal of buffers from out-queue in handle_control_message() when host has acked the close request. This seems less racy than doing it in the release function. This confuses me... why are we doing this in case

Re: [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter

Resorted to poaching now have we Pawel? I hope you were joking! Yes, of course. I thought that was clearly indicated by the jovial winking smiley. :) I realise it wasn't obvious soley by this exchange, but Pawel and I are actually ol' friends. Doing your work for you isn't poaching. This

[PATCH] virtio: Don't access index after unregister.

Virtio wants to release used indices after the corresponding virtio device has been unregistered. However, virtio does not hold an extra reference, giving up its last reference with device_unregister(), making accessing dev-index afterwards invalid. I actually saw problems when testing my

Re: [PATCH] virtio: Don't access index after unregister.

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com wrote: Virtio wants to release used indices after the corresponding virtio device has been unregistered. However, virtio does not hold an extra reference, giving up its last reference with device_unregister(), making

Re: [PATCH] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter

Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org writes: Resorted to poaching now have we Pawel? I hope you were joking! Yes, of course. I thought that was clearly indicated by the jovial winking smiley. :) I realise it wasn't obvious soley by this exchange, but Pawel and I are actually ol' friends.

Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming

Hi Gerd, Also, there was some interest from RedHat into using vSockets as a unified interface, routed over a hypervisor-specific transport (virtio or otherwise, although for now VMCI is the only one implemented). Can you outline how this can be done? From a quick look over the code it

[PATCH v3] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter

When the resource_size_t is 64-bit long, the sscanf() on the virtio device command line paramter string may return wrong value because its format was defined as %u. Fixed by using an intermediate local value of a known length. Also added cleaned up the resource creation and added extra comments

Re: [rfc net-next v6 3/3] virtio-net: change the number of queues through ethtool

On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 18:03 +0800, Jason Wang wrote: This patch implement the {set|get}_channels method of ethool to allow user to change the number of queues dymaically when the device is running. This would let the user to tune the device for specific applications. Signed-off-by: Jason

Re: [PATCH] virtio: Don't access index after unregister.

Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com writes: Virtio wants to release used indices after the corresponding virtio device has been unregistered. However, virtio does not hold an extra reference, giving up its last reference with device_unregister(), making accessing dev-index afterwards

Re: [PATCH v3] virtio-mmio: Fix irq parsing in command line parameter

Pawel Moll pawel.m...@arm.com writes: When the resource_size_t is 64-bit long, the sscanf() on the virtio device command line paramter string may return wrong value because its format was defined as %u. Fixed by using an intermediate local value of a known length. Also added cleaned up the

Re: [PATCH] virtio: Don't access index after unregister.

On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:43:47AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: Virtio wants to release used indices after the corresponding virtio device has been unregistered. However, virtio does not hold an extra reference, giving up its last reference with device_unregister(), making accessing dev-index

Re: [PATCH -next] tcm_vhost: remove unused variable in vhost_scsi_allocate_cmd()

Hello Wei, On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 20:53 +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: From: Wei Yongjun yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn The variable se_sess is initialized but never used otherwise, so remove the unused variable. dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.