On 22.11.12 at 18:37, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
I actually talked to Ian Jackson at LCE, and mentioned among other
things the bogosity of requiring a PUD page for three-level paging in
Linux -- a bogosity which has spread from Xen into native. It's a page
wasted for no good
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
...
specifying the number of the last transmit and receive queue that
is going to be used; thus out of transmitq0..transmitqn and
receiveq0..receiveqn where n=virtqueue_pairs will be used.
In this description, looks like n+1
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I still don't really get why it can't be isolated from dom0, which would
make more sense to me, even for a Xen crash.
On 23.11.12 at 11:37, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
I still don't really get why it can't be isolated
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 10:37 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
The crash region (as specified by crashkernel= on the Xen command line)
is isolated from dom0.
[...]
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 09:56 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.12 at 18:37, H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com wrote:
I actually talked to Ian Jackson at LCE, and mentioned among other
That was me actually (this happens surprisingly often ;-)).
things the bogosity of requiring a PUD page for
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:51:55AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 11:37, Daniel Kiper daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 23/11/2012 01:38, H. Peter
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:51:08AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 10:37 +, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:53:37AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.12 at 02:56, Andrew Cooper andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
The crash region (as specified by
Add RFS support to virtio network device.
Add a new feature flag VIRTIO_NET_F_RFS for this feature, a new
configuration field max_virtqueue_pairs to detect supported number of
virtqueues as well as a new command VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_RFS to program
packet steering for unidirectional protocols.
---
