Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet sending. This
would lead the pktgen to wait forever in the refcount of the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Userspace bits:
-
1) LKVM
The latest vhost-blk userspace bits for kvm tool can be found here:
g...@github.com:asias/linux-kvm.git blk.vhost-blk
2) QEMU
The latest vhost-blk userspace
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Rafael Aquini aqu...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 09:19:15AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
And managed to reproduce it only once through last night, here is the dump I
got
before the oops:
[ 2760.356820] page:ead00e00 count:1
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:20:35PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit_p is no longer
needed.
Signed-off-by: Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu
Cc: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Cc: Shreyas
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
Jason Wang jasow...@redhat.com wrote:
Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has been sent
(usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which optimizes for
virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the next packet
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:22:32PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devinit is no longer
needed.
...
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 2 +-
For VMXNET3:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@vmware.com
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:27:00PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
CONFIG_HOTPLUG is going away as an option so __devexit is no
longer needed.
...
drivers/net/vmxnet3/vmxnet3_drv.c | 2 +-
For VMXNET3:
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov d...@vmware.com
Thanks,
Dmitry
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:04PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
* * *
This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from
VMware.
Summary of changes:
- Sparse clean.
- Checkpatch clean with one exception, a complex macro in
which we can't add
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:37:54 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:04PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
* * *
This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from
VMware.
Summary of changes:
- Sparse clean.
- Checkpatch clean with one
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:37:54 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:04PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
* * *
This series of VMCI linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from
VMware.
Summary
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:23:57 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:37:54 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:04PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
* * *
This series of VMCI linux upstreaming
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:36:52PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:23:57 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:37:54 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:31:04PM -0800,
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:44:26 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:36:52PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:23:57 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:37:54 PM Greg
Greg
And why isn't George responding to my comments when I ask questions?
I think Andy or Dmitry replied faster...
We will improve our process from your comments,
Thanks a lot,
George
___
Virtualization mailing list
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
+#ifndef _VMCI_COMMONINT_H_
+#define _VMCI_COMMONINT_H_
+
+#include linux/printk.h
Why printk from a .h file?
+
+#define ASSERT(cond) BUG_ON(!(cond))
No, please no.
+
+#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_VMWARE 0x15AD
+#define
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:52:31PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:44:26 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:36:52PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:23:57 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM -0800,
Hi Greg,
For some reason it still didn't go through to our corporate mail server
but I see it on LKML.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:03:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
+static inline struct vmci_handle VMCI_MAKE_HANDLE(vmci_id cid,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:23:57PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Greg,
For some reason it still didn't go through to our corporate mail server
but I see it on LKML.
Good.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 04:03:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:43:03AM -0800, George Zhang
On 22/11/12 17:47, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
The other thing that should be considered here is how utterly
preposterous the notion of doing in-guest crash dumping is in a system
that contains a hypervisor. The reason for kdump is that on bare metal
there are no other options, but in a
On 22/11/2012 17:47, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
The other thing that should be considered here is how utterly
preposterous the notion of doing in-guest crash dumping is in a system
that contains a hypervisor. The reason for kdump is that on bare metal
there are no other options, but in a
Hi,
Le 23/11/2012 02:56, Andrew Cooper a écrit :
For within-guest kexec/kdump functionality, I agree that it is barking
mad. However, we do see cloud operators interested in the idea so VM
administrators can look after their crashes themselves.
It's not barking mad when your dayjob is to
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:52:31PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:44:26 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:36:52PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:23:57 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:01:04PM
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:27:07PM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:52:31PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Mind resending it, please?
Now resent.
I see both versions of Greg's message - one from 15 Nov, one
today's. On my Gmail account...
So Greg did
ping
On 19 November 2012 16:52, Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org wrote:
asm/xen/hypervisor.h was included twice.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org
---
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
24 matches
Mail list logo
