Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote: Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to implement new NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for

Re: Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
(2013/11/11 20:16), Ingo Molnar wrote: * Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote: Currently the blacklist is maintained by hand in kprobes.c which is separated from the function definition and is hard to catch up the kernel update. To solve this issue, I've tried to

Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote: After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. OK, I'll do. :) BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list

Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and prohibit probing on .entry.text

2013-11-11 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote: On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu masami.hiramatsu...@hitachi.com wrote: After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. OK, I'll do. :) BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs,