Hi Linus,
Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request.
If there's an issue, pls let me know!
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc:
>
> Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:19:29PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > You could use SYNC_ACQUIRE() to implement read_barrier_depends() and
> > smp_read_barrier_depends(), but SYNC_RMB probably does not suffice.
> > The reason for this is that
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> You could use SYNC_ACQUIRE() to implement read_barrier_depends() and
> smp_read_barrier_depends(), but SYNC_RMB probably does not suffice.
> The reason for this is that smp_read_barrier_depends() must order the
> pointer load against any
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Hi Linus,
Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request.
If there's an issue, pls let me know!
Thanks!
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
The following changes since commit
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request.
> If there's an issue, pls let me know!
It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra
indirection. Oh well, pulled now.
One