From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:35:50 +0200
> After removing the reset function, the freeze and restore functions
> are now unused when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled:
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1881:12: error: 'virtnet_restore_up' defined but not
> used
On 2017年07月24日 21:38, Andrew Jones wrote:
Unregister the driver before removing multi-instance hotplug
callbacks. This order avoids the warning issued from
__cpuhp_remove_state_cpuslocked when the number of remaining
instances isn't yet zero.
Fixes: 8017c279196a ("net/virtio-net: Convert to
On 07/23/2017 09:45 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 03:12:43PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/14/2017 04:19 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:42:35PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/12/2017 09:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
So the way I see it, there
On 2017年07月25日 23:35, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
After removing the reset function, the freeze and restore functions
are now unused when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled:
drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1881:12: error: 'virtnet_restore_up' defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int
On 2017年07月25日 05:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:54:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
Current XDP implementation wants guest offloads feature to be disabled
on device. This is inconvenient and means guest can't benefit from
offloads if XDP is not used. This patch tries
On 07/25/2017 10:53 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/24/2017 05:00
After removing the reset function, the freeze and restore functions
are now unused when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is disabled:
drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1881:12: error: 'virtnet_restore_up' defined but not
used [-Werror=unused-function]
static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
On Tue 25-07-17 14:47:16, Wang, Wei W wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> > > >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:42 PM, hal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> > On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> > >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >>>On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> >
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 25 Jul 2017 10:01:21 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's dead code, the core handles all this directly now.
>
> The only special case is nouveau and tda988x which used one function
> for both legacy modeset code and -nv50 atomic world instead of 2
>
On Tue 25-07-17 19:56:24, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
> >>On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>>[...
> >All
On 07/25/2017 07:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Tue 25-07-17 17:32:00, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...
All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
On 07/24/2017 05:00 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Wed 19-07-17 20:01:18, Wei Wang wrote:
On 07/19/2017 04:13 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...
All you should need is the check for the page reference count, no? I
assume you do some sort of pfn walk and so you should be able to get an
access to the
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 10:01 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> It's dead code, the core handles all this directly now.
>
> The only special case is nouveau and tda988x which used one function
> for both legacy modeset code and -nv50 atomic world instead of 2
> vtables. But amounts to exactly the same.
(ping)
Hi,
this has been on these lists for quite some time now. I want to start
preparing a virtio spec for virtio-mem soon.
So if you have any more comments/ideas/objections/questions, now is the
right time to post them :)
Thanks!
On 16.06.2017 16:20, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
It's dead code, the core handles all this directly now.
The only special case is nouveau and tda988x which used one function
for both legacy modeset code and -nv50 atomic world instead of 2
vtables. But amounts to exactly the same.
v2: Rebase over the panel/brideg refactorings in stm/ltdc.
16 matches
Mail list logo