On 2018年06月13日 12:24, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both
On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy
On 2018年06月13日 08:20, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 6/12/2018 4:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a
On 6/12/2018 4:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might
On 6/12/2018 4:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:02:45PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 6/11/2018 7:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2018
On 06/12/18 13:19, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> Oh, by [0] __GCC_STDC_INLINE__ is indeed actually the correct symbol
> to check for. Clang does support that, so nothing to fix there.
>
>> By the way, you should check clang against gcc's predefined macros by doing:
>>
>> gcc [options] -x c
On 6/12/18 1:05 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not
> as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a
> worthy reduction in lines of code.
>
> Untested due to lack of hardware and not understanding how to set up a
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:05 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not
> as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a
> worthy reduction in lines of code.
>
> Untested due to lack of hardware and not understanding
With its one user gone, remove the library code.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
---
include/linux/percpu_ida.h | 83 -
lib/Makefile | 2 +-
lib/percpu_ida.c | 370 -
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 454 deletions(-)
delete
Introduce target_free_tag() and convert all drivers to use it.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c| 4 ++--
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_util.c | 2 +-
drivers/target/sbp/sbp_target.c | 2 +-
drivers/target/tcm_fc/tfc_cmd.c | 4 ++--
,Greg KH
,jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com,jgr...@suse.com,Josh
Poimboeuf ,Matthias Kaehlcke
,thomas.lenda...@amd.com,Thiebaud Weksteen
,mj...@google.com,j...@perches.com
From: h...@zytor.com
Message-ID: <191e4ebe-4cb2-4c8b-ab61-689a91ffe...@zytor.com>
On June 12, 2018 11:33:14 AM PDT, Nick
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:32:03PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 09:15 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:22:42PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > Please introduce functions in the target core for allocating and freeing
> > > a tag
> > > instead
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 09:15 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:22:42PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> > > b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> > > index
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:22:42PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> > index 025dc2d3f3de..cdf671c2af61 100644
> > ---
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 03:37:00AM +, Liu, Changpeng wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefan Hajnoczi [mailto:stefa...@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 8, 2018 6:20 PM
> > To: Liu, Changpeng
> > Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org; cav...@redhat.com;
> >
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 09:00 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> index 025dc2d3f3de..cdf671c2af61 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_target.c
> @@ -3719,7 +3719,8 @@
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I don't think this is sufficient.
> >
> > If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
> > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 03:09:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
> The thing is cloud service provider might prefer sticking to the same
> level of service agreement (SLA) of keeping VF over migration,
That requirement is trivially satisfied by just a single VF :) If your
SLA does not require live
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:02:45PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 6/11/2018 7:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700,
On 06/12/2018 09:59 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 6:36 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Maybe it will help to have GFP_NONE which will make any allocation
fail if attempted. Linus, would this address your comment?
It would definitely have helped me initially overlook that call
20 matches
Mail list logo
