Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks

2020-10-17 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 09:09:28AM -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting >

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-17 Thread Jann Horn via Virtualization
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:09 PM Alexander Graf wrote: > There are applications way beyond that though. What do you do with > applications that already consumed randomness? For example a cached pool > of SSL keys. Or a higher level language primitive that consumes > randomness and caches its seed

Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks

2020-10-17 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 9:10 AM wrote: > > From: Tom Rix > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting > early acks. > > clang

Re: [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks

2020-10-17 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting > early

Re: [Cocci] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks

2020-10-17 Thread Joe Perches
On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 20:21 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, t...@redhat.com wrote: > > > From: Tom Rix > > > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > > I am wondering if the change could be

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-17 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:40 PM Jann Horn wrote: > > [adding some more people who are interested in RNG stuff: Andy, Jason, > Theodore, Willy Tarreau, Eric Biggers. also linux-api@, because this > concerns some pretty fundamental API stuff related to RNG usage] > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 4:33 PM

Re: [PATCH v1 05/29] virtio-mem: generalize check for added memory

2020-10-17 Thread David Hildenbrand
> Am 17.10.2020 um 00:38 schrieb Wei Yang : > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:32:50PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Ok, I seems to understand the logic now. > > But how we prevent ONLINE_PARTIAL memory block get offlined? There are > three > calls in

Re: [PATCH] drivers/virt: vmgenid: add vm generation id driver

2020-10-17 Thread Jann Horn via Virtualization
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:44 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:52:48AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 7:37 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 07:01:31AM +0200, Jann Horn wrote: > > > > Microsoft's documentation > > > >