On 09-07-21, 10:25, Jie Deng wrote:
> Add an I2C bus driver for virtio para-virtualization.
>
> The controller can be emulated by the backend driver in
> any device model software by following the virtio protocol.
>
> The device specification can be found on
>
在 2021/7/6 上午10:36, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
This commit implements the management netlink framework for ifcvf,
including register and add / remove a device
It works with iproute2:
[root@localhost lszhu]# vdpa mgmtdev show -jp
{
"mgmtdev": {
"pci/:01:00.5": {
在 2021/7/6 上午10:36, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
This commit introduces a new function get_dev_type() which returns
the virtio device id of a device, to avoid duplicated code.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan
Acked-by: Jason Wang
---
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 34
Add an I2C bus driver for virtio para-virtualization.
The controller can be emulated by the backend driver in
any device model software by following the virtio protocol.
The device specification can be found on
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202101/msg8.html.
By
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 17:53, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
>
> The driver core ignores the return value of this callback because there
> is only little it can do when a device disappears.
>
> This is the final bit of a long lasting cleanup quest where several
> buses were converted to also return void
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 05:09:13PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 6:22 PM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 11:04:18AM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 5, 2021 at 8:50 PM Stefan Hajnoczi
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 12:17:56PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> 在 2021/7/7 下午11:54, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 05:24:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > 在 2021/7/7 下午4:55, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:43:28AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > 在
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 04:05:29PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 05:42:54PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > The problem is that how blk-mq looks at that flag, since the device
> > representing the controller which allocates irq vectors isn't visible
> > to blk-mq.
>
> In
