> On Jul 25, 2022, at 11:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:32:46AM -0700, vd...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Vishnu Dasa
>>
>> Remove Rajesh as a maintainer for the VMCI driver.
>
> Why?
Rajesh is no longer with VMware and won't be working on VMCI.
>
>>
>> Acked-by: Brya
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:32:46AM -0700, vd...@vmware.com wrote:
> From: Vishnu Dasa
>
> Remove Rajesh as a maintainer for the VMCI driver.
Why?
>
> Acked-by: Bryan Tan
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Dasa
I need an ack from the person that is being removed here, for obvious
reasons. Any specific
From: Vishnu Dasa
Remove Rajesh as a maintainer for the VMCI driver.
Acked-by: Bryan Tan
Signed-off-by: Vishnu Dasa
---
MAINTAINERS | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 25a9365e0cca..356fc4014c2a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2170
On 25.07.22 13:27, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18/07/2022 14:35, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 14.07.22 15:20, Alexander Atanasov wrote:
>>> Allow the guest to know how much it is ballooned by the host.
>>> It is useful when debugging out of memory conditions.
>>>
>>> When host gets ba
Hi again,
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 05:48:18PM +0200, Jörg Rödel wrote:
> Please submit your proposals on the LPC website at:
>
> https://lpc.events/event/16/abstracts/
Thanks a lot for the numerous topic submissions! I am very exicted and I
am looking forward to great discussions at this mi
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:21:59 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
> of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() can
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 03:21:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
> of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync()
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 3:23 PM Xuan Zhuo wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:57:11 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:43 PM Xuan Zhuo
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:25:59 +0800, Jason Wang
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 在 2022/7/20 11:04, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > > >
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:57:11 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:43 PM Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:25:59 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > 在 2022/7/20 11:04, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
> > > > This patch implements the resize function of the rx queues.
> > > > Based on
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 3:22 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
> of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
> cancel_delayed_work_sync() can sc
We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
cancel_delayed_work_sync() can schedule the refill work then can
re-enable the NAPI that leads
11 matches
Mail list logo