,Jarkko Sakkinen ,Jeremy
Fitzhardinge ,Joe Millenbach ,Joerg
Roedel ,Johannes Weiner ,Josh Triplett
,Kyungmin Park ,Lee
Schermerhorn ,Len Brown ,Linux
Kernel Mailing List ,Marcelo Tosatti
,Marek Szyprowski ,Matt Fleming
,Mel Gorman ,Paul Turner
,Pavel Machek ,Pekka Enberg
,Peter Zijlstra ,
On 22/02/13 17:53, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:55:31AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:34:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Hi Linus,
This is a huge set of severa
> > [0.00] DMI: MSI MS-7680/H61M-P23 (MS-7680), BIOS V17.0 03/14/2011
> > [0.00] e820: update [mem 0x-0x0fff] usable ==> reserved
> > [0.00] e820: remove [mem 0x000a-0x000f] usable
> > [0.00] No AGP bridge found
> > [0.00] e820: last_pfn =
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> > >
>> > >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >
> > >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
> > >So I am not sure what has altered.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> >
>> >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
>> >So I am not sure what has
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:55:31AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:34:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > Hi Linus,
>> >
>> > This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
>>
On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:34:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
>> developed) changes, which is why the branch history is messier than
>> one would like.
>>
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >
> >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
> >So I am not sure what has altered.
> >
>
> Yes, there was a very specific reason why I wanted
On 02/22/2013 09:30 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL on?
You're probably hitting the new BUG_ON() in __phys_addr(). It's
intended to detect places where someone is doing a __pa()/__phys_addr()
on an address that's outside the kernel's identity mapping.
There are a lot o
On 02/22/2013 08:22 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ugh. So I've tried to walk through this, and it's painful. If this
results in problems, we're going to be *so* screwed. Is it bisectable?
I can't tell you for sure that it is bisectable at every point. There
are definite bisection points in ther
On 02/22/2013 09:24 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Here is a better serial log of the crash (just booting a normal Xen 4.1 +
initial
kernel with 8GB):
Configuration, please, especially: is early_printk compiled in? Also,
since this is Xen-related we really need your help on this. A lot
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:55:31AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:34:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
> > developed) changes, which is why the branch history is messier than
On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
So I am not sure what has altered.
Yes, there was a very specific reason why I wanted you guys to test it...
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Tec
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:34:06PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
> developed) changes, which is why the branch history is messier than
> one would like.
>
> The *really* big items are two humonguous patchsets mostl
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
> developed) changes, which is why the branch history is messier than
> one would like.
>
> The *really* big items are two humonguous patchsets mostly developed
> by Yingh
Hi Linus,
This is a huge set of several partly interrelated (and concurrently
developed) changes, which is why the branch history is messier than
one would like.
The *really* big items are two humonguous patchsets mostly developed
by Yinghai Lu at my request, which completely revamps the way we
c
17 matches
Mail list logo
