On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 02:33:39AM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
> In general, I think that from the start it was clear that the motivation for
> the patch-set is not just performance and also better code. For example, I
> see no reason to revert the PV-changes or the lock-prefix changes that
> improved
Revert the following commits:
- 5bdcd510c2ac9efaf55c4cbd8d46421d8e2320cd
("x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining
bugs")
- d5a581d84ae6b8a4a740464b80d8d9cf1e7947b2
("x86/cpufeature: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining
bugs")
- 0474d5d
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 06:17:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Revert the following commits:
>
> - 5bdcd510c2ac9efaf55c4cbd8d46421d8e2320cd
> ("x86/jump-labels: Macrofy inline assembly code to work around GCC inlining
> bugs")
>
> - d5a581d84ae6b8a4a740464b80d8d9cf1e7947b2
> ("x86/cpufea