From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 13:15:12 +0200
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:52:35PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> Once you sort this out, reply with an Acked-by: for me, thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Applied.
___
Virtuali
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:52:35PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:10:02 +0200
>
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Krishna Kumar2
> >> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
> >>
> >> > Jason Wang wrot
On 12/08/2011 12:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thre
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:10:02 +0200
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Krishna Kumar2
>> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
>>
>> > Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
>> >>
>> >> My description is not clear again :(
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Krishna Kumar2
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
>
> > Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
> >>
> >> My description is not clear again :(
> >> I mean the same vhost thead:
> >>
> >> vhost thread #0 transmits pack
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:25:15 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> I'm using ixgbe for testing also, for host, its driver seems provide irq
> affinity hint, so no binding or irqbalance is needed.
The hint is for irqbalance to use. You need to still do manual
affinity or use irqbalance.
On 11/28/2011 01:23 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
From: Krishna Kumar2
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thre
On 11/25/2011 12:09 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
My description is not clear again :(
I mean the same vhost thead:
vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
...
vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
of
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:35:52AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Krishna Kumar2
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
>
> > Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
> >>
> >> My description is not clear again :(
> >> I mean the same vhost thead:
> >>
> >> vhost thread #0 transmits pack
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:39:11AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
> >
> > My description is not clear again :(
> > I mean the same vhost thead:
> >
> > vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
> > ...
> > vhost thread #0 move to another
From: Krishna Kumar2
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530
> Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
>>
>> My description is not clear again :(
>> I mean the same vhost thead:
>>
>> vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
>> ...
>> vhost thread #0 move to another process N
Jason Wang wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
>
> My description is not clear again :(
> I mean the same vhost thead:
>
> vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
> ...
> vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
> of flow A
Thanks for clarifying. Yes
On 11/25/2011 11:07 AM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 11/24/2011 09:44:31 PM:
As far as I can see, ixgbe binds queues to physical cpu, so let
consider:
vhost thread transmits packets of flow A on processor M
during packet transmission, ixgbe driver programs the card to
On 11/25/2011 10:58 AM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
jasowang wrote on 11/24/2011 06:30:52 PM:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connect
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 11/24/2011 09:44:31 PM:
> > As far as I can see, ixgbe binds queues to physical cpu, so let
consider:
> >
> > vhost thread transmits packets of flow A on processor M
> > during packet transmission, ixgbe driver programs the card to
> > deliver the packet of flow A to
On 11/25/2011 12:14 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:56:45PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> >>On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, N
jasowang wrote on 11/24/2011 06:30:52 PM:
>
> >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> >>> It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
> >>> different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
> >>> for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
> >>> packet has
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 08:56:45PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> >>On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>>On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:00:52PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 07:14 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> >"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
> >
> >>Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
> >>
&
On 11/24/2011 07:14 PM, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device
On 11/24/2011 06:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when u
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 11/24/2011 03:29:03 PM:
> Subject Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> > It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
> > different v
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 06:13:41PM +0800, jasowang wrote:
> On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> >>It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
> >>different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
> >>for incom
On 11/24/2011 05:59 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 01:47:14PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
> It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
> different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
> for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
> packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
So this is sure to address
On 11/24/2011 04:17 PM, Krishna Kumar wrote:
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar
---
drivers/net/mac
It was reported that the macvtap device selects a
different vhost (when used with multiqueue feature)
for incoming packets of a single connection. Use
packet hash first. Patch tested on MQ virtio_net.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 16
1 file changed,
27 matches
Mail list logo
