Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-28 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Jürgen Groß writes: > Friendly ping... Ooops. I pick it up first thing tomorrow morning ___ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-28 Thread Jürgen Groß
Friendly ping... On 18.02.20 16:47, Juergen Gross wrote: Commit 111e7b15cf10f6 ("x86/ioperm: Extend IOPL config to control ioperm() as well") reworked the iopl syscall to use I/O bitmaps. Unfortunately this broke Xen PV domains using that syscall as there is currently no I/O bitmap support in

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-19 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 19.02.20 10:22, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Jürgen Groß writes: On 18.02.20 22:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: BTW, why isn't stuff like this not catched during next or at least before the final release? Is nothing running CI on upstream with all that XEN muck active? This problem showed up by not

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Jürgen Groß writes: > On 18.02.20 22:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> BTW, why isn't stuff like this not catched during next or at least >> before the final release? Is nothing running CI on upstream with all >> that XEN muck active? > > This problem showed up by not being able to start the X server

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.02.2020 06:35, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 18.02.20 22:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Juergen Gross writes: >>> Commit 111e7b15cf10f6 ("x86/ioperm: Extend IOPL config to control >>> ioperm() as well") reworked the iopl syscall to use I/O bitmaps. >>> >>> Unfortunately this broke Xen PV domains

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-18 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 18.02.20 22:03, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Juergen Gross writes: Commit 111e7b15cf10f6 ("x86/ioperm: Extend IOPL config to control ioperm() as well") reworked the iopl syscall to use I/O bitmaps. Unfortunately this broke Xen PV domains using that syscall as there is currently no I/O bitmap

Re: [PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-18 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Juergen Gross writes: > Commit 111e7b15cf10f6 ("x86/ioperm: Extend IOPL config to control > ioperm() as well") reworked the iopl syscall to use I/O bitmaps. > > Unfortunately this broke Xen PV domains using that syscall as there > is currently no I/O bitmap support in PV domains. > > Add I/O

[PATCH] x86/ioperm: add new paravirt function update_io_bitmap

2020-02-18 Thread Juergen Gross
Commit 111e7b15cf10f6 ("x86/ioperm: Extend IOPL config to control ioperm() as well") reworked the iopl syscall to use I/O bitmaps. Unfortunately this broke Xen PV domains using that syscall as there is currently no I/O bitmap support in PV domains. Add I/O bitmap support via a new paravirt