On 27.04.22 16:09, Tom Lendacky wrote:
On 4/27/22 07:37, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 27.04.22 14:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:37:31AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 26.04.22 19:35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
/
On 4/27/22 07:37, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 27.04.22 14:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:37:31AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 26.04.22 19:35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
/* protected virtualization */
static
On 27.04.22 14:26, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:40:08AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
I was planning to look at the x86 cpu features to see whether some of
those might be candidates to be switched to platform features instead.
I'd say "never touch a running system" unless th
On 27.04.22 14:28, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 08:37:31AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 26.04.22 19:35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
/* protected virtualization */
static void pv_init(void)
{
if (!is_
On 26.04.22 21:51, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:35:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
/* protected virtualization */
static void pv_init(void)
{
if (!is_prot_virt_guest())
return;
On 26.04.22 19:35, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
/* protected virtualization */
static void pv_init(void)
{
if (!is_prot_virt_guest())
return;
+ platform_set_feature(PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS);
Instead of using arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access() together
with CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_VIRTIO_MEMORY_ACCESS, replace those
with platform_has() and a new platform feature
PLATFORM_VIRTIO_RESTRICTED_MEM_ACCESS.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
---
I've only done a compile test on x86 for
