Hi Thomas,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v5.6-rc1 next-20200210]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base'
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 07.02.20 um 14:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> >> The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
> >> implementation. This covers the
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:36:49PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>
>
> Den 07.02.2020 09.41, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
> > The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
> > implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
> > DRM drivers. A call to
Den 07.02.2020 09.41, skrev Thomas Zimmermann:
> The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
> implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
> DRM drivers. A call to drm_simple_encoder_create() allocates and
> initializes an encoder instance, a call to
Hi
Am 07.02.20 um 14:37 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>> The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
>> implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
>> DRM drivers. A call to
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 02:37:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
> > implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
> > DRM drivers. A call to
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:41:31AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
> implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
> DRM drivers. A call to drm_simple_encoder_create() allocates and
> initializes an encoder
> > How about using
> >
> > #define drm_simple_encoder_init(dev, type, name, ...) \
> > drm_encoder_init(dev, drm_simple_encoder_funcs_cleanup, type, name,
> > __VA_ARGS__)
> >
> > instead ?
> I guess you want to save a few lines in the implementation of
> drm_simple_encoder_init() (?)
Hi Gerd
Am 07.02.20 um 11:33 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>> +static const struct drm_encoder_funcs drm_simple_encoder_funcs_cleanup = {
>> +.destroy = drm_encoder_cleanup,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_simple_encoder_init - Init a preallocated encoder
>> + * @dev: drm device
>> + * @funcs:
> +static const struct drm_encoder_funcs drm_simple_encoder_funcs_cleanup = {
> + .destroy = drm_encoder_cleanup,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * drm_simple_encoder_init - Init a preallocated encoder
> + * @dev: drm device
> + * @funcs: callbacks for this encoder
> + * @encoder_type: user visible type
The simple-encoder helpers initialize an encoder with an empty
implementation. This covers the requirements of most of the existing
DRM drivers. A call to drm_simple_encoder_create() allocates and
initializes an encoder instance, a call to drm_simple_encoder_init()
initializes a pre-allocated
11 matches
Mail list logo
