From: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan....@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit cce0ab2b2a39072d81f98017f7b076f3410ef740 ]

When irq number is negative(e.g., -EINVAL), the virtqueue
may be disabled or the virtqueues are sharing a device irq.
In such case, we should not setup irq offloading for a virtqueue.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan....@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220222115428.998334-3-lingshan....@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index ec5249e8c32d..05f5fd2af58f 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -97,8 +97,11 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, 
u16 qid)
                return;
 
        irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid);
+       if (irq < 0)
+               return;
+
        irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer);
-       if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0)
+       if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx)
                return;
 
        vq->call_ctx.producer.token = vq->call_ctx.ctx;
-- 
2.35.1

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

Reply via email to