Re: [PATCH RFC V6 2/11] x86/ticketlock: don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks

2012-03-22 Thread Raghavendra K T
On 03/21/2012 10:43 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge The code size expands somewhat, and its probably better to just call a function rather than inline it. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Signed-off-by: Raghavendra

Re: [PATCH RFC V6 2/11] x86/ticketlock: don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks

2012-03-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:21 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge > > The code size expands somewhat, and its probably better to just call > a function rather than inline it. > > Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T > --- >  arch/x86/Kconfig    

[PATCH RFC V6 2/11] x86/ticketlock: don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks

2012-03-21 Thread Raghavendra K T
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge The code size expands somewhat, and its probably better to just call a function rather than inline it. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T --- arch/x86/Kconfig |3 +++ kernel/Kconfig.locks |2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions