On 2020-08-06 17:47, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:23:01 +0200
...
This does work, and I'm tempted to queue this patch, but I'm wondering
whether we need to give up on a cross-architecture solution already
(especially keeping in mind that ccw is the only transport that is
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 16:23:01 +0200
Pierre Morel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In another series I proposed to add an architecture specific
> callback to fail feature negociation on architecture need.
>
> In VIRTIO, we already have an entry to reject the features on the
> transport basis.
>
> Transport
Hi all,
In another series I proposed to add an architecture specific
callback to fail feature negociation on architecture need.
In VIRTIO, we already have an entry to reject the features on the
transport basis.
Transport is not architecture so I send a separate series in which
we fail the
