On 2021/7/5 14:30, Viresh Kumar wrote:
This is still not enough to convince me. So I won't change them for now
until I see it
is the consensus of the majority.
Do you see reqs[i] to ever be NULL here ? If not, then if (req) is like if
(true).
Why would you want to have something like that
On 05-07-21, 14:21, Jie Deng wrote:
>
> On 2021/7/5 10:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 02-07-21, 12:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > > +static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > > > +
On 05-07-21, 14:22, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/7/5 12:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 05-07-21, 11:45, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > On 2021/7/5 10:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > > The right way of doing this is is making this function return - Error
> > > > on
On 2021/7/5 12:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 05-07-21, 11:45, Jie Deng wrote:
On 2021/7/5 10:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
The right way of doing this is is making this function return - Error on failure
and 0 on success. There is no point returning number of
On 2021/7/5 10:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 02-07-21, 12:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
+static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
+ struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
+
On 05-07-21, 11:45, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/7/5 10:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
> > The right way of doing this is is making this function return - Error on
> > failure
> > and 0 on success. There is no point returning number of successful additions
> > here.
On 2021/7/2 17:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
Add an I2C bus driver for virtio para-virtualization.
The controller can be emulated by the backend driver in
any device model software by following the virtio protocol.
The device
On 2021/7/5 10:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
I think we missed the first deadline for 5.14-rc1 as Wolfram should be out of
office now. Anyway lets make sure we fix all the pending bits before he is back
and see if we can still pull it off by rc2.
On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
diff --git
On 2021/7/5 10:43, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 02-07-21, 12:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
+static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
+ struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
+
On 02-07-21, 12:58, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> > +static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
> > + struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
> > + struct i2c_msg *msgs, int nr,
>
I think we missed the first deadline for 5.14-rc1 as Wolfram should be out of
office now. Anyway lets make sure we fix all the pending bits before he is back
and see if we can still pull it off by rc2.
On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 04:46:47PM +0800, Jie Deng wrote:
> Add an I2C bus driver for virtio para-virtualization.
>
> The controller can be emulated by the backend driver in
> any device model software by following the virtio protocol.
>
> The device specification can be found on
>
Add an I2C bus driver for virtio para-virtualization.
The controller can be emulated by the backend driver in
any device model software by following the virtio protocol.
The device specification can be found on
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202101/msg8.html.
By
13 matches
Mail list logo
