On 25-11-21, 07:24, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > Wolfram, you can apply that one as well, it looks okay.
>
> Is it? I read that the code only waits for the last request while
> Michael suggested to wait for all of them? And he did not ack patch 2
> while he acked patch 1. Did I misunderstand?
Okay,
On 24-11-21, 18:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 05:04:10PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > This fixes a couple of bugs in the buffer handling in virtio-i2c which can
> > result in incorrect data on the I2C bus or memory corruption in the guest.
> >
> > I tested this on
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 05:04:10PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> This fixes a couple of bugs in the buffer handling in virtio-i2c which can
> result in incorrect data on the I2C bus or memory corruption in the guest.
>
> I tested this on UML (virtio-uml needs a bug fix too, I will sent that o
This fixes a couple of bugs in the buffer handling in virtio-i2c which can
result in incorrect data on the I2C bus or memory corruption in the guest.
I tested this on UML (virtio-uml needs a bug fix too, I will sent that out
later) with the device implementation in rust-vmm/vhost-device.
Changes
