Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org writes:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:01:07PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
I appreciate very much that one of you may queue these two
patches into your tree so that userspace work can be kicked off,
since Michael has acked both patches and all comments have
been
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:01:07PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
I appreciate very much that one of you may queue these two
patches into your tree so that userspace work can be kicked off,
since Michael has acked both patches and all comments have
been addressed already.
Given that Michael also
Hi Jens and Rusty,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to
On 2014-06-30 19:36, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Jens and Rusty,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
virtio-blk device,
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one
virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's
hardware queue.
With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk
