On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 05:30:27PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hmmkay, I see vc_no_ghcb doing
>
> calldo_vc_no_ghcb
>
> and that's setup in early_idt_setup().
>
> vc_boot_ghcb(), OTOH, is called by do_early_exception() only so that one
> could be called handle_vc_boot_ghcb(), no? I.e.,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 02:07:49PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This are IDT entry points and the names above follow the convention for
> them, like e.g. 'page_fault', 'nmi' or 'general_protection'. Should I
> still add the verbs or just add a comment explaining what those symbols
> are?
Hmmkay,
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:22:30PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h
> > index b2cbcd40b52e..e1ed963a57ec 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h
> >
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:16:52PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h
> index b2cbcd40b52e..e1ed963a57ec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-es.h
> @@ -74,5 +74,6 @@ static inline u64
From: Joerg Roedel
Add the infrastructure to handle #VC exceptions when the kernel runs
on virtual addresses and has a GHCB mapped. This handler will be used
until the runtime #VC handler takes over.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel
---
arch/x86/include/asm/segment.h | 2 +-
