On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700
Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
gcc isn't smart enough
On Tue, 06 Jan 2015 16:55:30 -0700
Alex Williamson alex.william...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
len is always initialized since function is
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 18:05 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
len is always initialized since function is called with size 0.
I'm getting a panic inside a guest when this change is applied on the
I had to add an explicit tag to suppress compiler warning:
gcc isn't smart enough to notice that
len is always initialized since function is called with size 0.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 15
