On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:34:34 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
That's because we didn't do the request_irq's for the per_vector case,
because
we don't have the names. This is what prevented me from doing a nice
encapsulation.
Yes. But let's split free_vectors out into free_msix_vectors and
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:00:34PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:34:34 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
That's because we didn't do the request_irq's for the per_vector case,
because
we don't have the names. This is what prevented me from doing a nice
encapsulation.
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:19:26 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:00:34PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:34:34 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
That's because we didn't do the request_irq's for the per_vector case,
because
we don't have the names.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 08:32:24PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:19:26 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 07:00:34PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:34:34 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
That's because we didn't do the request_irq's
Sorry it took a bit to respond to this. I kept hoping I'll have time to
test it but looks like I won't before I'm on vacation. I agree it's
good cleanup, and maybe we can go even further, see below.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:07:52AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:03:08 pm
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:03:08 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:44:31PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
-
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:44:31PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
- double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal
- probe failure
On (Tue) Jul 28 2009 [12:44:31], Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
- double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal
- probe failure when vq
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:00:52PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Tue) Jul 28 2009 [12:44:31], Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
- double
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:17:09 am Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
- double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal
- probe failure when vq can't be assigned to msi-x vector
(reported on old host
This refactors find_vqs, making it more readable and robust, and fixing
two regressions from 2.6.30:
- double free_irq causing BUG_ON on device removal
- probe failure when vq can't be assigned to msi-x vector
(reported on old host kernels)
An older version of this patch was tested by Amit
11 matches
Mail list logo
