On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> OK, I've applied this patch; you might want to carry it in your tree
> too. You'll need to fix up your call to vring_new_virtqueue()
Will do. Thanks !
___
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualiz
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:35:26 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Linus Torvalds
> And rpmsg is using virtio to avoid implementing another shared memory
> "wire" protocol. And of course to be able to reuse all the existing
> virtio drivers (e.g. net, block, console) wit
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:35:26 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> > On x86, there really is never any reason to use the heavy memory
> > barriers unless you are talking to a real device. And last I saw,
> > "virtio" was still about virtual IO.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On x86, there really is never any reason to use the heavy memory
> barriers unless you are talking to a real device. And last I saw,
> "virtio" was still about virtual IO.
I reported this originally, so maybe I should describe our use case
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> So the whole thing looks confused. There's never any reason to
> actually use the expensive sfence/rfences at all. Afaik you still just
> want smp_*mb() for all cases.
But note that I haven't thought deeply about it, I just looked at the
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This one as a signed tag on github, in case the inline patch was
> the reason you dropped this.
No, and please why do you make your tag-names be your email address?
That's just odd. It seems to be related to some broken SCM system that
think
This one as a signed tag on github, in case the inline patch was
the reason you dropped this.
virtio-mmio in new 3.2, and they found a corruption bug. Please apply.
* [new tag] ru...@rustcorp.com.au -> ru...@rustcorp.com.au
The following changes since commit b3b1b70e62a603f473619dbebc3b
