Re: [RFC][ PATCH 0/3] vhost-net: Add mergeable RX buffer support to vhost-net

2010-03-03 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:20:03PM -0800, David Stevens wrote: These patches add support for mergeable receive buffers to vhost-net, allowing it to use multiple virtio buffer heads for a single receive packet. +-DLS Signed-off-by: David L Stevens

Re: [RFC][ PATCH 0/3] vhost-net: Add mergeable RX buffer support to vhost-net

2010-03-03 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:54:25AM -0800, David Stevens wrote: Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 03/02/2010 11:54:32 PM: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:20:03PM -0800, David Stevens wrote: These patches add support for mergeable receive buffers to vhost-net, allowing it to use

[RFC][ PATCH 0/3] vhost-net: Add mergeable RX buffer support to vhost-net

2010-03-03 Thread David Stevens
These patches add support for mergeable receive buffers to vhost-net, allowing it to use multiple virtio buffer heads for a single receive packet. +-DLS Signed-off-by: David L Stevens dlstev...@us.ibm.com ___

Re: [RFC][ PATCH 0/3] vhost-net: Add mergeable RX buffer support to vhost-net

2010-03-03 Thread David Stevens
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com wrote on 03/02/2010 11:54:32 PM: On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:20:03PM -0800, David Stevens wrote: These patches add support for mergeable receive buffers to vhost-net, allowing it to use multiple virtio buffer heads for a single receive packet.

Re: [RFC][ PATCH 0/3] vhost-net: Add mergeable RX buffer support to vhost-net

2010-03-03 Thread David Stevens
Interesting. Since the feature in question is billed first of all a performance optimization... By whom? Although I see some improved performance, I think its real benefit is improving memory utilization on the guest. Instead of using 75K for an ARP packet, mergeable RX buffers only uses 4K.