On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:10:40PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jason Wang
> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:37:17 +0800
>
> > We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
> > mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
> > loses all other XPS func
From: Jason Wang
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:37:17 +0800
> We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
> mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
> loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure
> their own transmission steer
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
>> mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
>> loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to co
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:37:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
> mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
> loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure
> their own transmission st
We used to use a percpu structure vq_index to record the cpu to queue
mapping, this is suboptimal since it duplicates the work of XPS and
loses all other XPS functionality such as allowing use to configure
their own transmission steering strategy.
So this patch switches to use XPS and suggest a de